A global investigation into in situ nanoindentation experiments on zirconia: from the sample geometry optimization to the stress nanolocalization using convergent beam electron diffraction

Nanoindentation experiments inside a transmission electron microscope are of much interest to characterize specific phenomena occuring in materials, like for instance dislocation movements or phase transformations. The key points of these experiments are (i) the sample preparation and the optimization of its geometry to obtain reliable results and (ii) the choice of the transmission electron microscope observation mode, which will condition the type of information which can be deduced from the experiment. In this paper, we will focus on these two key points in the case of nanoindentation of zirconia, which is a ceramic material well known to be sensitive to stress because it can undergo a phase transformation. In this case, the information sought is the stress localization at the nanometre scale and in real time. As far as the sample preparation is concerned, one major drawback of nanoindentation inside a transmission electron microscope is indeed a possible bending of the sample occurring during compression, which is detrimental to the experiment interpretation (the stress is not uniaxial anymore). In this paper, several sample preparation techniques have been used and compared to optimize the geometry of the sample to avoid bending. The results obtained on sample preparation can be useful for the preparation of ceramics samples but can also give interesting clues and experimental approaches to optimize the preparation of other kinds of materials.

[1]  J. Bowen,et al.  Effects of focused ion beam milling on electron backscatter diffraction patterns in strontium titanate and stabilized zirconia , 2012, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  K. Tsuzaki,et al.  Direct observation of plastic deformation in iron–3% silicon single crystal by in situ nanoindentation in transmission electron microscopy , 2011 .

[3]  W. Gerberich,et al.  Smaller is tougher , 2011 .

[4]  Dustin M. Hulbert,et al.  Grain and grain boundary activities observed in alumina–zirconia–magnesia spinel nanocomposites by in situ nanoindentation using transmission electron microscopy , 2010 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Hartmann,et al.  Improved precision in strain measurement using nanobeam electron diffraction , 2009 .

[6]  David R. Clarke,et al.  The Tetragonal-Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends , 2009 .

[7]  B. J. Inkson,et al.  In situ TEM nanoindentation and deformation of Si-nanoparticle clusters , 2009 .

[8]  A M Minor,et al.  Ultrahigh stress and strain in hierarchically structured hollow nanoparticles. , 2008, Nature materials.

[9]  J. M. Martín,et al.  Superlow friction of ta-C lubricated by glycerol: An electron energy loss spectroscopy study , 2007 .

[10]  M. Jenko,et al.  FIB damage of Cu and possible consequences for miniaturized mechanical tests , 2007 .

[11]  A. Morawiec An algorithm for refinement of lattice parameters using CBED patterns. , 2007, Ultramicroscopy.

[12]  J. Hosson,et al.  In situ TEM nanoindentation and dislocation-grain boundary interactions: a tribute to David Brandon , 2006 .

[13]  A. Minor,et al.  A new view of the onset of plasticity during the nanoindentation of aluminium , 2006, Nature materials.

[14]  T. Malis,et al.  Recent advances in FIB–TEM specimen preparation techniques , 2006 .

[15]  J. Hosson,et al.  Effects of solute Mg on grain boundary and dislocation dynamics during nanoindentation of Al–Mg thin films , 2004 .

[16]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Martensitic relief observation by atomic force microscopy in yttria-stabilized zirconia , 2003, 1710.04442.

[17]  V. Oleshko,et al.  Use of Plasmon Spectroscopy to Evaluate the Mechanical Properties of Materials at the Nanoscale , 2002, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[18]  D. Munz,et al.  Tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in CeO2-stabilized zirconia under multiaxial loading , 2001 .

[19]  van der Erik Giessen,et al.  Modeling of the competition between shear yielding and crazing in glassy polymers , 2000 .

[20]  Lucille A. Giannuzzi,et al.  A review of focused ion beam milling techniques for TEM specimen preparation , 1999 .

[21]  R. Egerton,et al.  Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope , 1995, Springer US.

[22]  Y. Morii,et al.  Crystal Structure of Metastable Tetragonal Zirconia by Neutron Powder Diffraction Study , 1993 .

[23]  D. Brownlee,et al.  Cometary Particles: Thin Sectioning and Electron Beam Analysis , 1986, Science.

[24]  A. Howie,et al.  Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals , 1977, Nature.

[25]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Evidence for the formation of distorted nanodomains involved in the phase transformation of stabilized zirconia by coupling convergent beam electron diffraction and in situ TEM nanoindentation , 2013 .

[26]  L. R. Francis Rose,et al.  The martensitic transformation in ceramics — its role in transformation toughening , 2002 .

[27]  L. A. Giannuzzia,et al.  A review of focused ion beam milling techniques for TEM specimen preparation , 1999 .

[28]  Pierre Stadelmann,et al.  EMS-A software package for electron diffraction analysis and HREM image simulation in materials science , 1987 .

[29]  R. Hill The mathematical theory of plasticity , 1950 .