Optimal Selectivity and Effort Cost A Simple Bioeconomic Model with an Application to the Bay of Biscay Nephrops Fishery

Abstract This article investigates the relationship between optimal gear selectivity and effort cost in the fishing industry. We first show that optimal selectivity depends negatively on the level of effort cost, but that this relationship is not continuous. Optimal selectivity switches when real effort cost goes beyond a certain level, and this switch induces a non-marginal reduction in the level of fishing effort. In the second part of this article, we show that the current level of real effort cost in the Nephrops fishery of the Bay of Biscay is far below the switch point, which makes high selectivity optimal. The discrepancy between optimal and current selectivity may be explained by the state of the fishery management and also by the fact that selectivity is hardly observable with the type of gear presently used. JEL Classification Codes: Q22, Q57, H23

[1]  N. Rawlinson,et al.  Assessment and benefits of damage reduction in prawns due to use of different bycatch reduction devices in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia , 2000 .

[2]  O. R. Eigaard,et al.  Impact of technological creep on fishing effort and fishing mortality, for a selection of European fleets , 2007 .

[3]  K. Stergiou,et al.  Selectivity experiments in the NE Mediterranean: the effect of trawl codend mesh size on species diversity and discards , 1997 .

[4]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  The effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats: biological, conservation and socio-economic issues , 2000 .

[5]  Aida Campos,et al.  Using a modified Nordmøre grid for by-catch reduction in the Portuguese crustacean-trawl fishery , 2005 .

[6]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the dynamics of exploited fish populations , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[7]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[8]  Patrick Berthou,et al.  Synthèse des flottilles de pêche 2004 - Mer du Nord, Manche, Atlantique , 2005 .

[9]  D. MacLennan.  Gear selectivity and the variation of yield , 1995 .

[10]  T Moth-Poulsen,et al.  Selectivity experiments with escape windows in the North Sea Nephrops (Nephrops norvegicus) trawl fishery , 1999 .

[11]  S. Jennings,et al.  The role of gear technologists in supporting an ecosystem approach to fisheries , 2007 .

[12]  J. Ward.  The Bioeconomic Implications of A Bycatch Reduction Device as a Stock Conservation Management Measure , 1994, Marine Resource Economics.

[13]  V. Tschernij,et al.  A modelling approach for assessing short-term catch losses as a consequence of a mesh size increase , 2004 .

[14]  M. Schirripa,et al.  Effects of mortality and gear selectivity on the fish otolith radius–total length relation , 2000 .

[15]  B. Marlen.  Technical modifications to reduce the by-catches and impacts of bottom-fishing gears , 2000 .

[16]  Richard Law,et al.  Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution , 2000 .

[17]  R. Chambers.  Environmental influences on egg and propagule sizes in marine fishes , 1997 .

[18]  Olivier Guyader,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of improving trawl selectivity in the case of discards: The Nephrops norvegicus fishery in the Bay of Biscay , 2008 .

[19]  F. Sardá,et al.  The role of technical measures in European fisheries management and how to make them work better , 2007 .

[20]  C. Kvamme,et al.  Assessing the effects on stocks of selectivity changes in a fishery , 2004 .

[21]  Sean Pascoe,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Bycatch Reduction Devices in European Brown Shrimp Trawl Fisheries , 2004 .