Women’s Business Ownership: Operating Within the Context of Institutional and In-Group Collectivism

The development of women’s entrepreneurship has positive implications for societal and economic growth. In this study, we examine the effects of culture and, more specifically, collectivism on women’s businesses. With a mixed-method and multilevel approach, we conducted a quantitative country-level analysis followed by a qualitative study of women entrepreneurs. Our results indicate that collectivism at the in-group level (family and close friends and colleagues) is a particularly important predictor of women’s business ownership. Furthermore, it is a balance of both collectivism and individualism at the in-group level that is most conducive to women’s business ownership. Institutional collectivism (at the societal level) acts as a background condition that influences the way in which in-group collectivism directly affects women’s business ownership. More specifically, when engaging in business development, women are primarily influenced by their in-groups. The freedom to pursue individual goals, combined with support from the in-group, provides the most beneficial environment for women to develop businesses, especially in societal-level cultures at the extreme ends of the collectivism spectrum—highly collectivistic or highly individualistic. A better understanding of these cultural factors should help with designing better business development training programs for women entrepreneurs and properly advising policy makers.

[1]  Kent E. Neupert,et al.  The Normative Context for Women's Participation in Entrepreneruship: A Multicountry Study , 2006 .

[2]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[3]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment , 2012 .

[4]  L. Smircich,et al.  Extending the Boundaries: Reframing “Entrepreneurship as Social Change” Through Feminist Perspectives , 2009 .

[5]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[6]  Olivier Giacomin,et al.  Entrepreneurial Perceptions and Intentions: The Role of Gender and Culture , 2012 .

[7]  C. Nardone,et al.  Being in Someone Else’s Shoes: the Role of Gender in Nascent Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[8]  Sibylle Heilbrunn,et al.  Juggling Family and Business , 2011 .

[9]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[10]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[11]  Jeff Allen,et al.  Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism Versus Collectivism , 1994 .

[12]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  The Growth of the Firm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice , 1996 .

[13]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[14]  F. Welter,et al.  Advancing a Framework for Coherent Research on Women's Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[15]  Paul Brewer,et al.  Individualism–Collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE , 2011 .

[16]  María-José Pinillos,et al.  Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data , 2011 .

[17]  Jane D. Parent,et al.  Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed? , 2002 .

[18]  Helene Ahl Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions , 2006, The Praxis of Diversity.

[19]  磯辺 剛彦,et al.  起業と経済成長 : global entrepreneurship monitor調査報告 , 2011 .

[20]  Violina P. Rindova,et al.  Entrepreneuring as Emancipation , 2009 .

[21]  R. Ayman,et al.  Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. , 2010, The American psychologist.

[22]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  NEW FIRM CREATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 2007 .

[23]  Roy Thurik,et al.  Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level , 2005 .

[24]  L. Uhlaner,et al.  Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[25]  V. Pillai,et al.  Determinants of women's non-family work in Ghana and Zimbabwe , 2003 .

[26]  N. Nummela,et al.  Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective , 2006 .

[27]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Positivism or Non-Positivism - Tertium Non Datur , 2007, Ontologies.

[28]  M. Semyonov,et al.  Family Policies, Wage Structures, and Gender Gaps: Sources of Earnings Inequality in 20 Countries , 2005 .

[29]  S. Coleman Access to Debt Capital for Women- and Minority-Owned Small Firms: Does Educational Attainment Have an Impact? , 2004 .

[30]  Frances M. Hill,et al.  The Philosophy and Practice of Interpretivist Research in Entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[31]  C. Gibson,et al.  Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research , 2005 .

[32]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches , 2006 .

[33]  Cindy Wu,et al.  Overt employment discrimination in MNC affiliates: home-country cultural and institutional effects , 2008 .

[34]  P. Kantor Gender, Microenterprise Success and Cultural Context: The Case of South Asia , 2002 .

[35]  G. Hofstede What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds , 2006 .

[36]  Robert J. House,et al.  Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from project GLOBE , 2001 .

[37]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[38]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Content Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: The Case of Initial Public Offerings , 1989 .

[39]  E. Gilliard International Labor Organization , 1952, International Organization.

[40]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective , 2003 .

[41]  M. Erez,et al.  A Dynamic, Multi‐Level Model of Culture: From the Micro Level of the Individual to the Macro Level of a Global Culture , 2004 .

[42]  E. Kelly Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[43]  E. Diener,et al.  Individualism: A Valid and Important Dimension of Cultural Differences Between Nations , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[45]  Jennifer E. Jennings,et al.  Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice , 2007 .

[46]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Culture Specific and Cross-Culturally Generalizable Implicit Leadership Theories: Are Attributes of Charismatic/Transformational Leadership Universally Endorsed? , 1998 .

[47]  Jenny M. Hoobler,et al.  Bosses' Perceptions of Family-Work Conflict and Women's Promotability: Glass Ceiling Effects , 2009 .

[48]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[49]  Jonathan Marshall,et al.  Implications for Future Research , 2004 .

[50]  Eleanor Shaw,et al.  A guide to the qualitative research process: evidence from a small firm study , 1999 .

[51]  M. Minniti Female Entrepreneurship and Economic Activity , 2010 .

[52]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[53]  S. Terjesen,et al.  Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda , 2009 .

[54]  Nada Kobeissi Gender factors and female entrepreneurship: International evidence and policy implications , 2010 .

[55]  David G. Blanchflower Entrepreneurship in the United States , 2007 .

[56]  Rob Gailey,et al.  Empowering Women through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India , 2012 .

[57]  Mirjam van Praag,et al.  What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[58]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2022 .

[59]  Jeff Allen,et al.  Individualism and the Modern Corporation: Implications for Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[60]  L. Giddings Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[61]  Scott Shane,et al.  Cultural influences on national rates of innovation , 1993 .

[62]  N. Fuller-Love,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Perceptions of Business Networks: Does Gender Matter? , 2011 .

[63]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[64]  T. Scandura,et al.  Research Methodology In Management: Current Practices, Trends, And Implications For Future Research , 2000 .

[65]  James H. Tiessen Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research , 1997 .

[66]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors , 2013 .

[67]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  National Culture and Entrepreneurship : A Review of Behavioral Research , 2002 .

[68]  F. Welter,et al.  A gender‐aware framework for women's entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[69]  S. Green How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[70]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research , 2011 .

[71]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[72]  Occupational Gender Desegregation in the 1980s , 1995 .

[73]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[74]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[75]  Anna Buehring,et al.  Evaluating Qualitative Management Research: Towards a Contingent Criteriology , 2006 .

[76]  M. Taylor,et al.  Does culture still matter?: The effects of individualism on national innovation rates , 2012 .

[77]  Peter Beike,et al.  Culture Leadership And Organizations The Globe Study Of 62 Societies , 2016 .