Using Google Street View to Audit the Built Environment: Inter-rater Reliability Results

BackgroundObservational field audits are recommended for public health research to collect data on built environment characteristics. A reliable, standardized alternative to field audits that uses publicly available information could provide the ability to efficiently compare results across different study sites and time.PurposeThis study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability of built environment audits conducted using Google Street View imagery.MethodsIn 2011, street segments from St. Louis and Indianapolis were geographically stratified to ensure representation of neighborhoods with different land use and socioeconomic characteristics in both cities. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using observed agreement and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa statistic (PABAK).ResultsThe mean PABAK for all items was 0.84. Ninety-five percent of the items had substantial (PABAK ≥ 0.60) or nearly perfect (PABAK ≥ 0.80) agreement.ConclusionsUsing Google Street View imagery to audit the built environment is a reliable method for assessing characteristics of the built environment.

[1]  Douglas K Miller,et al.  Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  Fred Fridinger,et al.  Environmental and Policy Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Physical Activity: Issues and Opportunities , 1995, Health education quarterly.

[3]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Julien O. Teitler,et al.  Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  F. Hoehler Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Bronwen T. Taylor,et al.  Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  R. Brownson,et al.  Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. , 2006, Annual review of public health.

[8]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: a research agenda. , 2008, Journal of physical activity & health.

[9]  H. Badland,et al.  Can Virtual Streetscape Audits Reliably Replace Physical Streetscape Audits? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[10]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  Active Neighborhood Checklist: A User-Friendly and Reliable Tool for Assessing Activity Friendliness , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[11]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: what contributes to dissemination by state health departments. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  A multilevel ecological approach to promoting walking in rural communities. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[14]  A. Bauman,et al.  Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.