A Chimeric Point-Light Walker

Ambiguity has long been used as a probe into visual processing. Here, we describe a new dynamic ambiguous figure—the chimeric point-light walker—which we hope will prove to be a useful tool for exploring biological motion. We begin by describing the construction of the stimulus and discussing the compelling finding that, when presented in a mask, observers consistently fail to notice anything odd about the walker, reporting instead that they are watching an unambiguous figure moving either to the left or right. Some observers report that the initial percept fluctuates, moving first to the left, then to the right, or vice versa; others always perceive a constant direction. All observers, when briefly shown the unmasked ambiguous figure, have no difficulty in perceiving the novel motion pattern once the mask is returned. These two findings—the initial report of unambiguous motion and the subsequent ‘primed’ perception of the ambiguity—are both consistent with an important role for top–down processing in biological motion. We conclude by suggesting several domains within the realm of biological-motion processing where this simple stimulus may prove to be useful.

[1]  I. Nachson,et al.  Impairments in judgment of chimeric faces by schizophrenic and affective patients. , 1999, The International journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Creating stimuli for the study of biological-motion perception , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Josef Ternus,et al.  The problem of phenomenal identity. , 1938 .

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[5]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Bistability and Biasing Effects in the Perception of Ambiguous Point-Light Walkers , 2004, Perception.

[6]  N. Troje Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention: Exporting vision to the mind , 1998 .

[8]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[10]  S. Chokron,et al.  Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  F. C. Barker XXIX. Collective effects in nuclei of mass 18 and 19 , 1956 .

[12]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[13]  M J Tarr,et al.  What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views? , 1999, Perception.

[14]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Perceptual learning in object recognition: object specificity and size invariance , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[16]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[18]  T. Poggio,et al.  Biologically Plausible Neural Model for the Recognition of Biological Motion and Actions , 2002 .

[19]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[20]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  L J Bernstein,et al.  Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Kiyoshi Fujimoto,et al.  Motion Induction from Biological Motion , 2003, Perception.

[23]  T D Albright,et al.  Visual motion perception. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[25]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure from Motion of Rigid and Jointed Objects , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[26]  The left visual hemispace bias for the perception of chimeric faces: a further test of the difficulty of discrimination hypothesis. , 2001, Brain and cognition.

[27]  G. Johansson Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[29]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981, Psychological review.

[31]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[32]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  Direction repulsion in motion transparency , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[35]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based recognition of biological motion, scenes and objects , 2003 .

[36]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Biological Motion Shown Backwards: The Apparent-Facing Effect , 2002, Perception.

[37]  K. Verfaillie Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Perceptual Bias for Forward-Facing Motion , 1992 .

[40]  W. Dittrich Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[41]  J. Levy Lateral dominance and aesthetic preference , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  K. Verfaillie Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the gender of walkers from point-lights mounted on ankles: Some second thoughts , 1978 .

[44]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.