Regression Models Predicting Trunk Muscles' PCSAs of Korean People

This study quantified 7 trunk muscles` physiological cross-sectional areas (PCSAs) and developed prediction equations for the physiological cross-sectional area as a function of anthropometic variables for Korean people. Nine females and nine males were participated in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans approximately from S1 through T8. Muscle fiber angle corrected cross-sectional areas (anatomical cross sectional areas: ACSAs) were recorded at each vertebral level and maximum value of ACSAs were determined as physiological cross sectional area (PCSA). There was a significant gender difference in PCSAs of all muscles (p

[1]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Quality criteria for process design in the design process — industrial case studies and an expert panel , 1998 .

[2]  M. Tracy,et al.  The Geometry of the Muscles of the Lumbar Spine Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1989, Spine.

[3]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle size and locations from CT scans of 96 women of age 40 to 63 years. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Nunzia Carbonara,et al.  Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes: A case study , 2006 .

[6]  R W Norman,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  S Dowlatshahi The role of product safety and liability in concurrent engineering , 2001 .

[8]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation , 2003 .

[9]  A B Schultz,et al.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Lina Santaguida,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature from T5 to L5 using MRI scans of 15 young males corrected for muscle fibre orientation. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A creativity-based design process for innovative product design , 2004 .

[14]  M. W.S.,et al.  Occupational low back disorder causation and control , 2001 .

[15]  R W Norman,et al.  Effects of an anatomically detailed erector spinae model on L4/L5 disc compression and shear. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts , 1976 .

[18]  W. Marras Occupational low back disorder causation and control , 2000, Ergonomics.

[19]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of Loads on the Lumbar Spine , 1981, Spine.