Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies.

[1]  B. Kramer,et al.  Cancer screening. , 2021, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[3]  N L Müller,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[5]  Phillip C. Bunch.  Objective imaging characteristics of mammographic screen-film systems , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Craig A. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  P. Prorok,et al.  Non-parametric estimation of the post-lead-time survival distribution of screen-detected cancer cases. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  D'Orsi Cj,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of mammograms. , 1995 .

[9]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[10]  R. Wahl,et al.  New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Campbell,et al.  Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[14]  H E Rockette,et al.  The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  J A Swets,et al.  Enhancing and Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  J W Cullen,et al.  Cancer prevention and control. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[18]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[19]  J. Hanley.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[20]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[21]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[22]  C. Meinert.  Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct, and Analysis , 1986 .

[23]  J. Swets.  Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  J. Gohagan.  Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Risk, Detection Protocols, and Therapeutic Implications , 1982 .

[25]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[26]  D. Kolb.  Management and the Learning Process , 1976 .

[27]  Barbara Carlsson,et al.  R&D Organizations As Learning Systems. , 1976 .

[28]  L B Lusted,et al.  Signal detectability and medical decision-making. , 1971, Science.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .