Evaluation and Classification of Overseas Talents in China Based on the BWM for Intuitionistic Relations

Efficient utilization of human resources is an important force for the sustainable development of society and the economy. Against the backdrop of the development of economic globalization, the Chinese Government is presently implementing the strategy of “Strengthening the Nation with Talent” to assist the exploitation and management of human resources. Overseas talents have recently become an important resource. How to scientifically evaluate and classify overseas talents has become an important research topic, and it is necessary to seek a systematic decision aid. This paper introduces a novel methodology to evaluate and classify overseas talents in China under the intuitionistic relations environment. Firstly, we determine the weighted values of decision makers and criteria through defining geometry consistency. Secondly, we construct a non-linear Best-Worst-Method (BWM) model with intuitionistic preference relations. A highlight of this BWM model for intuitionistic relations is taking both positive and negative aspects into consideration, which is different from the original BWM. Finally, the proposed methodology is applied to an illustrative example of overseas talent evaluation, indicating the simultaneous efficiency and practicability of the method.

[1]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Priority Weight Intervals Derived From Intuitionistic Multiplicative Preference Relations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  A W Labib,et al.  An intelligent maintenance model (system): an application of the analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy logic rule-based controller , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Adem Göleç,et al.  A fuzzy model for competency-based employee evaluation and selection , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Metin Celik,et al.  Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[6]  H Md Azamathulla,et al.  ANFIS-based approach for the estimation of transverse mixing coefficient. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Joan D. Mahoney,et al.  Early identification of international executive potential , 1997 .

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Compatibility measures and consensus models for group decision making with intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Shouzhen Zeng,et al.  Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: An extension of the MULTIMOORA method , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Ying-Chyi Chou,et al.  Human resources for science and technology: Analyzing competitiveness using the analytic hierarchy process , 2008 .

[11]  Jindong Qin,et al.  Multi-attribute group decision making using combined ranking value under interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multiplicative Consistency of hesitant fuzzy Preference Relation and its Application in Group Decision Making , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Preference Relations Based on Intuitionistic Multiplicative Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[14]  Lei Zhong Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on Performance of High-level Talents , 2011 .

[15]  Li-Wei Lee,et al.  Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[18]  László Csató,et al.  An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis players , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  J. Rezaei,et al.  A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method , 2016 .

[21]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environments , 2010, Inf. Fusion.

[22]  R. W. Wright,et al.  Trends in International Business Research: Twenty-Five Years Later , 1994 .

[23]  Fang Liu,et al.  A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[24]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relations , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[26]  Ying-Chyi Chou,et al.  Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[27]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[29]  Baoding Liu,et al.  Chance constrained integer programming models for capital budgeting in fuzzy environments , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[31]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[32]  Bai Chen Building of Evaluation Theory Model of Innovative Scientific & Technical Talents , 2012 .

[33]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on incomplete intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[34]  Peng Zhe Research on Quality Oriented Evaluation and Discovery Mechanism of Scientific and Technical Talents , 2015 .

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Multiplicative Sets , 2014, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making , 2002 .

[37]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems , 2008 .

[38]  S. M. Mousavi,et al.  A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2013 .

[39]  Zhang Ha Research on Evaluation Mechanism of Innovation-driven Science and Technology Talents During the 13th Five-Year Plan in China , 2015 .

[40]  D. Mcclelland Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". , 1973, The American psychologist.

[41]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[42]  M. Alicke,et al.  Deconstructing the better-than-average effect. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Young-Jou Lai,et al.  IMOST: Interactive Multiple Objective System Technique , 1995 .

[44]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An automatic ranking approach for multi-criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2015, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..