Contextual Cueing of Tactile Search Is Coded in an Anatomical Reference Frame

This work investigates the reference frame(s) underlying tactile context memory, a form of statistical learning in a tactile (finger) search task. In this task, if a searched-for target object is repeatedly encountered within a stable spatial arrangement of task-irrelevant distractors, detecting the target becomes more efficient over time (relative to nonrepeated arrangements), as learned target-distractor spatial associations come to guide tactile search, thus cueing attention to the target location. Since tactile search displays can be represented in several reference frames, including multiple external and an anatomical frame, in Experiment 1 we asked whether repeated search displays are represented in tactile memory with reference to an environment-centered or anatomical reference frame. In Experiment 2, we went on examining a hand-centered versus anatomical reference frame of tactile context memory. Observers performed a tactile search task, divided into a learning and test session. At the transition between the two sessions, we introduced postural manipulations of the hands (crossed ↔ uncrossed in Expt. 1; palm-up ↔ palm-down in Expt. 2) to determine the reference frame of tactile contextual cueing. In both experiments, target-distractor associations acquired during learning transferred to the test session when the placement of the target and distractors was held constant in anatomical, but not external, coordinates. In the latter, RTs were even slower for repeated displays. We conclude that tactile contextual learning is coded in an anatomical reference frame.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  Markus Conci,et al.  Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Adaptation to Change in Memory-Guided Visual Search , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial Modulation of Tactile Temporal-Order Judgments , 2005, Perception.

[4]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Independence of long-term contextual memory and short-term perceptual hypotheses: Evidence from contextual cueing of interrupted search , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[5]  Dragan Rangelov,et al.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Medial temporal lobe-dependent repetition suppression and enhancement due to implicit vs. explicit processing of individual repeated search displays , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Common Anatomical and External Coding for Hands and Feet in Tactile Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Oscillatory activity reflects differential use of spatial reference frames by sighted and blind individuals in tactile attention , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  L. Jiménez Attention and implicit learning , 2003 .

[13]  Liwei Sun,et al.  Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Salvador Soto-Faraco,et al.  Spatial remapping of tactile events , 2008, Communicative & integrative biology.

[15]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A computational neural theory of multisensory spatial representations , 2004 .

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  K. E. Overvliet,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Relative finger position influences whether you can localize tactile stimuli , 2010 .

[18]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Kramer,et al.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[22]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Ole Jensen,et al.  Parietal Oscillations Code Nonvisual Reach Targets Relative to Gaze and Body , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Heed,et al.  Towards explaining spatial touch perception: Weighted integration of multiple location codes , 2016, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[25]  B. Röder,et al.  Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[26]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[27]  B. Röder,et al.  Spatial remapping of touch: confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[29]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[31]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained Maintenance of Somatotopic Information in Brain Regions Recruited by Tactile Working Memory , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Transfer of Spatial Context from Visual to Haptic Search , 2003, Perception.

[33]  Takatsune Kumada,et al.  Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing , 2007 .

[34]  Ole Jensen,et al.  Multiple Reference Frames in Cortical Oscillatory Activity during Tactile Remapping for Saccades , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Leonardo Assumpção,et al.  Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.