Multiphysics CATHARE2 modeling and experimental validation methodology against CABRI transients

Abstract CABRI is an experimental pulse reactor, funded by the french Institute for Radiological protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) and operated by CEA at the Cadarache nuclear center, France. Its aim is to study and thus to better understand RIA (Reactivity-Initiated Accident) effects on nuclear fuels. The restart of the CABRI reactor in 2015 offers the opportunity to validate tools involving multiphysic calculation schemes on reactivity insertions (RI) transients at a system scale. Physics of the in-pile CABRI tests is complex and implies various physical fields (solid and fluid thermics, thermal-hydraulics, mechanics and neutronics) and their coupled effects. The reactivity insertion in CABRI is mastered by the depressurization of a neutron absorber ( 3 He), contained into transient rods. The increase of the neutron flux inside the core induces the neutronic power increase inside the core and a multiphysic effect, called “TOP” effect, inside the in-core transient rods that causes an acceleration of the gas depressurization. The challenge is thus to manage the simulation of these RIA complex transients catching the governing multiphysical phenomena to be identified. In order to achieve this objective, a model for the CABRI transients and a scientific calculation tool have been developed and should be validated. This paper proposes a modeling of governing multiphysic phenomena of RIA transients in CABRI reactor based on a Quantified Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table (QPIRT). These models are introduced in the CATHARE2 tool in a dedicated version named PALANTIR and Best-Estimate simulation results are compared with experimental data obtained on CABRI commission tests: core power and 3 He pressure evolution.

[1]  Pierre Ruyer,et al.  Experimental investigation of heat transfer in transient boiling , 2014 .

[2]  P. Blaise,et al.  Modeling of the 3He Density Evolution Inside the CABRI Transient Rods During Power Transients , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  M. Laurent,et al.  Conductivité thermique des solides , 1993, Caractérisation et propriétés de la matière.

[4]  T. Mckrell,et al.  Transient boiling of water under exponentially escalating heat inputs. Part I: Pool boiling , 2016 .

[5]  G. E. Wilson,et al.  The role of the PIRT process in experiments, code development and code applications associated with Reactor Safety analysis , 1998 .

[6]  K. Lassmann,et al.  The revised URGAP model to describe the gap conductance between fuel and cladding , 1987 .

[7]  Fabrice Gaudier URANIE: The CEA/DEN Uncertainty and Sensitivity platform , 2010 .

[8]  T. Mckrell,et al.  Transient boiling of water under exponentially escalating heat inputs. Part II: Flow boiling , 2016 .

[9]  A. Marrel,et al.  Statistical Methodology for a Quantified Validation of Sodium Fast Reactor Simulation Tools , 2019, Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification.

[10]  B. Rameau,et al.  CATHARE 2 V2.5_2: A single version for various applications , 2011 .

[11]  P. Blaise,et al.  Coupled Experimental and Computational Approach for CABRI Power Transients Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Andrea Zoia,et al.  New kinetic simulation capabilities for Tripoli-4®: Methods and applications , 2018, Annals of Nuclear Energy.