Validation of a method to convert an image to appear as if acquired using a different digital detector

A method to convert digital mammograms acquired on one system to appear as if acquired using another system is presented. This method could be used to compare the clinical efficacy of different systems. The signal transfer properties modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectra (NPS) were measured for two detectors - a computed radiography (CR) system and a digital radiography (DR) system. The contributions to the NPS from electronic, quantum and structure sources were calculated by fitting a polynomial at each spatial frequency across the NPS at each dose. The conversion process blurs the original image with the ratio of the MTFs in frequency space. Noise with the correct magnitude and spatial frequency was added to account for differences in the detector response and dose. The method was tested on images of a CDMAM test object acquired on the two systems at two dose levels. The highest dose images were converted to lower dose images for the same detector, then images from the DR system were converted to appear as if acquired at a similar dose using CR. Contrast detail curves using simulated CDMAM images closely matched those of real images.

[1]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function. , 2003, Medical physics.

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Kenneth E. Huff,et al.  Computer Simulation Of Radiographic Screen-Film Images , 1986, Other Conferences.

[5]  N W Marshall,et al.  Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  F R Verdun,et al.  A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  A Workman,et al.  A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  G Belli,et al.  Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  Adam Workman Simulation of digital mammography images , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Validation of a Simulated Dose Reduction Methodology Using Digital Mammography CDMAM Images and Mastectomy Images , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.