On the Error Probability of Interference Exploitation Precoding with Power Allocation

In this paper, we analyze the performance of constructive interference (CI) precoding in downlink multi-user multiple-input single-output (MU-MISO) systems with phase-shift-keying (PSK) signals. A new closed-form expression is derived for the moment generating function (MGF) of the received signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). Then, the MGF is used to calculate the average symbol error probability (SEP) for the CI technique. In light of this, new exact analytical expression and very accurate asymptotic expression for the average SEP are presented. Based on the new SEP expressions, a power allocation scheme to minimize the sum SEPs (Min-Sum) is investigated, and analytical expression of the power allocation factors is derived. The numerical results show that, the CI precoding yields superior performance over conventional interference suppression precoding techniques in terms of SEP. Furthermore, the Min-Sum power allocation scheme provides additional up to 10dB gains in the transmit SNR compared to equal power allocation technique.

[1]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Dynamic linear precoding for the exploitation of known interference in MIMO broadcast systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Exploiting Known Interference as Green Signal Power for Downlink Beamforming Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Constructive Interference Based Secure Precoding: A New Dimension in Physical Layer Security , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[4]  Volker Jungnickel,et al.  Performance of MIMO systems with channel inversion , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[5]  Khairi Ashour Hamdi,et al.  Wireless Power Transfer in Multi-Pair Two-Way AF Relaying Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Interference Exploitation Precoding Made Practical: Optimal Closed-Form Solutions for PSK Modulations , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Bruno Clerckx,et al.  Rate Splitting With Finite Constellations: The Benefits of Interference Exploitation vs Suppression , 2019, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.

[8]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication-part I: channel inversion and regularization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Mandy Eberhart,et al.  Digital Communication Over Fading Channels , 2016 .

[10]  Zhi Ding,et al.  Linear Precoder Design for MIMO Interference Channels with Finite-Alphabet Signaling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  Sivarama Venkatesan,et al.  MIMO Communication for Cellular Networks , 2011 .

[12]  Matthew R. McKay,et al.  Error probability and SINR analysis of optimum combining in rician fading , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Sum Rate and Fairness Analysis for the MU-MIMO Downlink Under PSK Signalling: Interference Suppression vs Exploitation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Christos Masouros,et al.  Error Probability Analysis and Power Allocation for Interference Exploitation Over Rayleigh Fading Channels , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Marco Chiani,et al.  New exponential bounds and approximations for the computation of error probability in fading channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..