Is Feasibility in Physics Limited by Fantasy Alone

Although various limits on the predicability of physical phenomena as well as on physical knowables are commonly established and accepted, we challenge their ultimate validity. More precisely, we claim that fundamental limits arise only from our limited imagination and fantasy. To illustrate this thesis we give evidence that the well-known Turing incomputability barrier can be trespassed via quantum indeterminacy. From this algorithmic viewpoint, the “fine tuning” of physical phenomena amounts to a “(re)programming” of the universe. Take a few moments for some anecdotal recollections. Nuclear science has made true the ancient alchemic dream of producing gold from other elements such as mercury through nuclear reactions. A century ago, similar claims would have disqualified anybody presenting them as quack. Medical chemistry discovered antibiotics which cure Bubonic plague, tuberculosis, syphilis, bacterial pneumonia, as well as a wide range of bacterial infectious diseases which were considered untreatable only one hundred years ago. For contemporaries it is hard to imagine the kind of isolation, scarcity in international communication, entertainment and transportation most of our ancestors had to cope with.

[1]  E. Specker DIE LOGIK NICHT GLEICHZEITIG ENTSC HEIDBARER AUSSAGEN , 1960 .

[2]  Hajnal Andréka,et al.  General relativistic hypercomputing and foundation of mathematics , 2009, Natural Computing.

[3]  Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.  Exploring RANDOMNESS , 2001, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.

[4]  R. M. Blake The Paradox of Temporal Process , 1926 .

[5]  M. Born Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[6]  M. P. Seevinck,et al.  E. Specker: "The logic of non-simultaneously decidable propositions" (1960) , 2011, 1103.4537.

[7]  Konrad Zuse,et al.  Rechnender Raum , 1991, Physik und Informatik.

[8]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[9]  H. Weyl,et al.  Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science , 1950 .

[10]  A. Zeilinger A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics , 1999, Synthese Library.

[11]  J. Lester Chapter 16 – Distance Preserving Transformations , 1995 .

[12]  A. Zeilinger The message of the quantum , 2005, Nature.

[13]  M. Redhead Quantum theory and measurement , 1984 .

[14]  F. Gonseth,et al.  DIE LOGIK NICHT GLEICHZEITIG ENTSCHEIDBARER AUSSAGEN , 1990 .

[15]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  Von Neumann Normalisation and Symptoms of Randomness: An Application to Sequences of Quantum Random Bits , 2011, UC.

[16]  E. Specker,et al.  The Logic of Propositions Which are not Simultaneously Decidable , 1975 .

[17]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  A note on accelerated Turing machines , 2010, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[18]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics , 1975 .

[19]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[20]  P. Atkins,et al.  The Logico–Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics Vol 1: Historical Evolution , 1976 .

[21]  A. Peres Defining length , 1984, Nature.

[22]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  Quantum randomness and value indefiniteness , 2006, quant-ph/0611029.

[23]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Quantum theory and measurement , 1983 .

[24]  K. Svozil v 1 2 7 Se p 20 06 Contexts in quantum , classical and partition logic , 2008 .

[25]  Herzog,et al.  Complementarity and the quantum eraser. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[26]  S. Shostak Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science , 2013 .