Modeling Land-Use Decision Behavior with Bayesian Belief Networks

The ability to incorporate and manage the different drivers of land-use change in a modeling process is one of the key challenges because they are complex and are both quantitative and qualitative in nature. This paper uses Bayesian belief networks (BBN) to incorporate characteristics of land managers in the modeling process and to enhance our understanding of land-use change based on the limited and disparate sources of information. One of the two models based on spatial data represented land managers in the form of a quantitative variable, the area of individual holdings, whereas the other model included qualitative data from a survey of land managers. Random samples from the spatial data provided evidence of the relationship between the different variables, which I used to develop the BBN structure. The model was tested for four different posterior probability distributions, and results showed that the trained and learned models are better at predicting land use than the uniform and random models. The inference from the model demonstrated the constraints that biophysical characteristics impose on land managers; for older land managers without heirs, there is a higher probability of the land use being arable agriculture. The results show the benefits of incorporating a more complex notion of land managers in land-use models, and of using different empirical data sources in the modeling process. Future research should focus on incorporating more complex social processes into the modeling structure, as well as incorporating spatio- temporal dynamics in a BBN.

[1]  Roy A. Sanderson,et al.  Modelling bird distributions — a combined GIS and bayesian rule-based approach , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  E. C. Mackey,et al.  Land Cover Change: Scotland from the 1940s to the 1980s , 1999 .

[3]  François Bousquet,et al.  Adapting Science to Adaptive Managers: Spidergrams, Belief Models, and Multi-agent Systems Modeling , 2002 .

[4]  P J Bacon,et al.  Belief network models of land manager decisions and land use change. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  M. Hill,et al.  Knowledge-based and inductive modelling of rough fescue (Festuca altaica, F. campestris and F. hallii) distribution in Alberta, Canada , 1997 .

[6]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  What drives tropical deforestation?: a meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence , 2001 .

[7]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Empirical based agent-based modeling Creating Agents and Landscapes for Multiagent Systems from Random Samples , 2006 .

[8]  R. Burton Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer's’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour , 2004 .

[9]  Sarah Davis,et al.  Complexity, land-use modeling, and the human dimension: Fundamental challenges for mapping unknown outcome spaces , 2008 .

[10]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions , 2003 .

[11]  J Hornberger,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO BAYESIAN REASONING , 2001, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  A. Mather Rural land occupancy in Scotland: Resources for research , 1995 .

[13]  H. Briassoulis Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches , 2000 .

[14]  G. Fisher,et al.  Land Capability Classification for Agriculture , 1982 .

[15]  B. Marcot,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement , 2001 .

[16]  Zhen Lei,et al.  Distributed Modeling Architecture of a Multi-Agent-Based Behavioral Economic Landscape (MABEL) Model , 2005, Simul..

[17]  Richard J. Aspinall,et al.  An inductive modelling procedure based on Bayes' theorem for analysis of pattern in spatial data , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[19]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Application of a Bayesian Network in a GIS Based Decision Making System , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  J. R. O'Callaghan,et al.  Land use: the interaction of economics, ecology and hydrology. , 1998 .

[21]  Tony Prato,et al.  Multiple attribute evaluation of landscape management , 2000 .

[22]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? , 2000 .

[23]  W. Marcus,et al.  Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho , 2001 .

[24]  I. Makin,et al.  Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka , 2003 .

[25]  W. Mcconnell Meeting in the middle: The challenge of meso-level integration , 2002 .

[26]  Daniel Zelterman,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2005, Technometrics.

[27]  Timothy C. Haas,et al.  A Bayesian belief network advisory system for aspen regeneration , 1991 .

[28]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  Exploring complex dynamics in multi agent-based intelligent systems: theoretical and experimental approaches using the multi agent-based behavioral economic landscape (mabel) model , 2006 .

[29]  M. K. Gillespie,et al.  Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. , 2000 .

[30]  J. Cain Planning improvements in natural resource management. Guidelines for using Bayesian networks to support the planning and management of development programmes in the water sector and beyond , 2001 .