Streamlining Cell Therapy Manufacture

T he cell therapy industry (CTI) is no longer a cottage industry; it is a distinct and sustainable component of the global healthcare sector (1). Today, CTI prospects are strong, with annual revenues exceeding US$1 billion/year, supported by improving investor sentiment and public support (1–3). The next phase of CTI growth — toward a multibillion-dollar global industry — will depend on the biomanufacturing community innovating to meet growing market demands and providing products at affordable costs to healthcare payers. Currently, the majority of cell therapy clinical trials are in phases 1 or 2 (4). However, as more CTI companies break the phase 3 frontier, clinical trials and regulatory requirements are becoming increasingly more predictable. This enables new companies to start out with a focus firmly on commercialization, using lessons learned from preceding trials to streamline their manufacturing processes and minimize the time to market. Here we propose a simple requirements-based framework for approaching three key, interrelated aspects of cell therapy bioprocessing that must be considered as these therapies translate from laboratory development to market launch: characterization, scale-up, and cost of goods (CoGs). In particular, we highlight the critical need to appreciate commercial implications of key bioprocessing decisions to maximize the efficiency and speed of cell therapy translation.

[1]  C. Mason,et al.  Cell therapy industry: billion dollar global business with unlimited potential. , 2011, Regenerative medicine.

[2]  Chris Mason,et al.  Peak serum: implications of serum supply for cell therapy manufacturing. , 2012, Regenerative medicine.

[3]  Chris Mason,et al.  Regenerative medicine cell therapies: numbers of units manufactured and patients treated between 1988 and 2010. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[4]  Mike Hoare,et al.  Regenerative medicine bioprocessing: the need to learn from the experience of other fields. , 2006, Regenerative medicine.

[5]  R. Blendon,et al.  The public, political parties, and stem-cell research. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  C. Mason,et al.  The impact of market volatility on the cell therapy industry. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[7]  Scott R Burger,et al.  Developing assays to address identity, potency, purity and safety: cell characterization in cell therapy process development. , 2012, Regenerative medicine.

[8]  Simon Edwards-Parton,et al.  A decade of cell therapy clinical trials (2000-2010). , 2012, Regenerative medicine.

[9]  M. Frid,et al.  Pulmonary Circulation and Hypoxia Hypoxia , leukocytes , and the pulmonary circulation , 2004 .

[10]  C. Mason,et al.  Bioprocess Forces and Their Impact on Cell Behavior: Implications for Bone Regeneration Therapy , 2011, Journal of tissue engineering.

[11]  C. Mason,et al.  Cell therapy commercialisation , 2012 .

[12]  Jochen Strube,et al.  Challenges in biotechnology production—generic processes and process optimization for monoclonal antibodies , 2005 .

[13]  Chris Mason,et al.  The Translation Cycle: round and round in cycles is the only way forward for regenerative medicine. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[14]  D. Kirouac,et al.  The systematic production of cells for cell therapies. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[15]  Jon A. Rowley Developing Cell Therapy Biomanufacturing Processes , 2010 .

[16]  Saurabh Aggarwal,et al.  What's fueling the biotech engine--2010 to 2011. , 2011, Nature biotechnology.

[17]  Saurabh Aggarwal,et al.  What's fueling the biotech engine? , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.