Adaptivity of Tuning Functions in a Generic Recurrent Network Model of a Cortical Hypercolumn

The representation of orientation information in the adult visual cortex is plastic as exemplified by phenomena such as perceptual learning or attention. Although these phenomena operate on different time scales and give rise to different changes in the response properties of neurons, both lead to an improvement in visual discrimination or detection tasks. If, however, optimal performance is indeed the goal, the question arises as to why the changes in neuronal response properties are so different. Here, we hypothesize that these differences arise naturally if optimal performance is achieved by means of different mechanisms. To evaluate this hypothesis, we set up a recurrent network model of a visual cortical hypercolumn and asked how each of four different parameter sets (strength of afferent and recurrent synapses, neuronal gains, and additive background inputs) must be changed to optimally improve the encoding accuracy of a particular set of visual stimuli. We find that the predicted changes in the population responses and the tuning functions were different for each set of parameters, hence were strongly dependent on the plasticity mechanism that was operative. An optimal change in the strength of the recurrent connections, for example, led to changes in the response properties that are similar to the changes observed in perceptual learning experiments. An optimal change in the neuronal gains led to changes mimicking neural effects of attention. Assuming the validity of the optimal encoding hypothesis, these model predictions can be used to disentangle the mechanisms of perceptual learning, attention, and other adaptation phenomena.

[1]  N. Qian,et al.  Learning and adaptation in a recurrent model of V1 orientation selectivity. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[3]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Gillespie,et al.  Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and its integral. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[5]  G. Orban,et al.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons , 2001, Nature.

[6]  Eilon Vaadia,et al.  Learning-Induced Improvement in Encoding and Decoding of Specific Movement Directions by Neurons in the Primary Motor Cortex , 2004, PLoS biology.

[7]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons , 2001, Neuroscience.

[9]  Xiaohui Xie Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding , 2002, Network.

[10]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[12]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Bethge,et al.  Optimal neural rate coding leads to bimodal firing rate distributions. , 2003, Network.

[15]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Si Wu,et al.  Attention Modulation of Neural Tuning Through Peak and Base Rate , 2001, Neural Computation.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[19]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input , 2002, Neuron.

[20]  E. Miller,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Mutual Information, Fisher Information, and Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[22]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Oren Shriki,et al.  Rate Models for Conductance-Based Cortical Neuronal Networks , 2003, Neural Computation.

[24]  M. Paradiso,et al.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.