Model predictive control of magnetically actuated mass spring dampers for automotive applications

Mechatronic systems such as those arising in automotive applications are characterized by significant non-linearities, tight performance specifications as well as by state and input constraints which need to be enforced during system operation. This paper takes a view that model predictive control (MPC) and hybrid models can be an attractive and systematic methodology to handle these challenging control problems, even when the underlying process is not hybrid. In addition, the piecewise affine (PWA) explicit form of MPC solutions avoids on-line optimization and can make this approach computationally viable even in situations with rather constrained computational resources. To illustrate the MPC design procedure and the underlying issues, we focus on a specific non-linear process example of a mass spring damper system actuated by an electromagnet. Such a system is one of the most common elements of mechatronic systems in automotive systems, with fuel injectors representing a concrete example. We first consider a linear MPC design for the mechanical part of the system. The approach accounts for all the constraints in the system but one, which is subsequently enforced via a state-dependent saturation element. Second, a hybrid MPC approach for the mechanical subsystem is analysed that can handle all the constraints by design and achieves better performance, at the price of a higher complexity of the controller. Finally, a hybrid MPC design that also takes into account the electrical dynamics of the system is considered.

[1]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Vehicle Propulsion Systems: Introduction to Modeling and Optimization , 2005 .

[2]  K.V. Ling,et al.  A FPGA implementation of model predictive control , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[3]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Hybrid Model Predictive Control of Direct Injection Stratified Charge Engines , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Tutorial overview of model predictive control , 2000 .

[5]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Approximate explicit receding horizon control of constrained nonlinear systems , 2004, Autom..

[6]  L.G. Bleris,et al.  A co-processor FPGA platform for the implementation of real-time model predictive control , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[7]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  HYSDEL-a tool for generating computational hybrid models for analysis and synthesis problems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Eduardo Sontag Nonlinear regulation: The piecewise linear approach , 1981 .

[10]  R. H. Miller,et al.  Control of constrained nonlinear systems: a case study , 2000 .

[11]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Predictive control : with constraints , 2002 .

[12]  H.E. Tseng,et al.  Hybrid Model Predictive Control Application Towards Optimal Semi-Active Suspension , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2005. ISIE 2005..

[13]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Landing reference governor , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[14]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A survey of industrial model predictive control technology , 2003 .

[15]  W. F. Powers,et al.  The role of electronic controls for future automotive mechatronic systems , 1996 .

[16]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Optimal Control for Bouncing Suppression of CNG Injectors , 2004 .

[17]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Mechatronic Systems: Fundamentals , 2003 .

[18]  J. Asgari,et al.  Automotive mechatronic systems , 2000 .

[19]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems , 2003, Autom..

[20]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints , 1999, Autom..