Using ordered values of subregional cartilage thickness change increases sensitivity in detecting risk factors for osteoarthritis progression.

OBJECTIVE To examine whether ordered values of (sub)regional femorotibial cartilage thickness change are superior to region-based approaches in detecting risk factors for cartilage loss in osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS 58 women with knee OA had 3 Tesla MR images acquired at baseline and 24 months. Changes in cartilage thickness (∆ThCtAB) were determined in eight medial femorotibial subregions. An ascending sort of individual ∆ThCtAB measurements was done to create "ordered values". Risk factors for cartilage loss considered were: age, BMI, anatomical knee axis (AAA), minimal (medial) joint space width (mJSW), and percent of medial tibial plateau covered by the meniscus (percent cover). All change metrics were tested for association with the risk factors using Kendall's τ and relative sensitivity of multiple tests of subregions and ordered values were compared with single metrics of change from plate and compartment summaries and the first ordered value. RESULTS The associations between subregion ∆ThCtAB and AAA (P=0.0002), mJSW (P=0.016), and age (P=0.011) were significant, but only AAA (at α=0.05) and age (at α=0.1) remained significant after adjusting for multiple subregions. In contrast, cMFTC had P-values<0.05 for AAA (P=0.0001), mJSW (P=0.016), and meniscus subluxation (0.04). The first ordered value had significant associations with AAA (P=0.0004), mJSW (P=0.003), meniscus subluxation (P=0.02) and percent cover (P=0.031) all of which were significant at α=0.05 after adjusting for tests on multiple risk factors. CONCLUSION Ordered values of ∆ThCtAB were more sensitive in detecting risk factors of cartilage loss than subregional ∆ThCtAB. Sensitivity was further enhanced by considering the minimum ordered value as a single test, thus not requiring adjustment for multiple tests. Using ordered values there was a significant association between ∆ThCtAB and baseline AAA, mJSW, meniscus subluxation and meniscus percent cover. This study provides an important step in validating ordered values of cartilage change.

[1]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Does the use of ordered values of subregional change in cartilage thickness improve the detection of disease progression in longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis? , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Relation of regional articular cartilage morphometry and meniscal position by MRI to joint space width in knee radiographs. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  A Guermazi,et al.  The association of meniscal pathologic changes with cartilage loss in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  T. Vogl,et al.  Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  H C Charles,et al.  Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women--comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  F Eckstein,et al.  Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Longitudinal study of the relationship between knee angle and tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[8]  T. Vail,et al.  A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage loss in painful contralateral knees with and without radiographic joint space narrowing: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The clinical correlates of articular cartilage defects in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study. , 2005, Rheumatology.

[11]  26 REGIONAL CARTILAGE LOSS IN PATIENTS WITH FEMOROTIBIAL OSTEOARTHRITIS WITH NEUTRAL, VALGUS, AND VARUS KNEE ALIGNMENT , 2007 .

[12]  E. Vignon,et al.  Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  F. Eckstein,et al.  387 ORDERED VALUES OF CARTILAGE LOSS IN KNEE SUBREGIONS MORE EFFICIENTLY DIFFERENTIATE PROGRESSION AT DIFFERENT RADIOGRAPHIC STAGES OF OA: DATA FROM THE OA INITIATIVE , 2009 .

[14]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2009, Arthritis research & therapy.

[16]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Relationship of meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, malalignment, and joint laxity to subsequent cartilage loss in osteoarthritic knees. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Patterns of femorotibial cartilage loss in knees with neutral, varus, and valgus alignment. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes , 2005, Arthritis research & therapy.

[19]  Subhabrata Chakraborti,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[20]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[21]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Change in knee angle influences the rate of medial tibial cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  F Eckstein,et al.  Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss--comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[24]  D A Bloch,et al.  Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study , 2007, Arthritis research & therapy.

[26]  R Burgkart,et al.  Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[27]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon–Schuss radiography , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[28]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  H C Charles,et al.  Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[30]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[31]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative imaging of cartilage morphology at 3.0 Tesla in the presence of gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd‐DTPA) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Performance of a non-fluoroscopically assisted substitute for the Lyon schuss knee radiograph: quality and reproducibility of positioning and sensitivity to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritic knees. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[33]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of the Lyon Schuss and fixed flexion radiographic techniques. Long-term reproducibility in normal knees and sensitivity to change in osteoarthritic knees , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.