Low Energy Impact Damage Modes in Aluminum Foam and Polymer Foam Sandwich Structures

The energy absorption of an aluminum foam sandwich structure and a conventional polymer foam sandwich structure is similar for impacts ranging from 5 to 25 J. The polymer foam-based samples exhibit localized damage in the form of skin fracture and core crushing, but with negligible permanent out-of-plane deformation. In contrast, the aluminum foam-based samples show little fracture but exhibit extensive out-of-plane deformation radiating from the impact point. This deformation suggests that the impact damage could be more easily detectable in the aluminum foam sandwich structure. Surface strains are lower in the aluminum foam sandwich samples during post-impact loading in a single cantilever beam test, suggesting improved damage tolerance.

[1]  A. Kallmeyer,et al.  Effect of Temperature on the Low-velocity Impact Behavior of Composite Sandwich Panels , 2005 .

[2]  W. Cantwell,et al.  The impact response of aluminum foam sandwich structures based on a glass fiber‐reinforced polypropylene fiber‐metal laminate , 2004 .

[3]  C. M. Kindervater,et al.  Composite Strength and Energy Absorption as an Aspect of Structural Crash Resistance , 1993 .

[4]  Z. Aboura,et al.  Stitching Effect on Static and Dynamic Behaviour of Sandwich Structures , 2005 .

[5]  Wesley J. Cantwell,et al.  The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures , 2002 .

[6]  G. Dvorak,et al.  Enhancement of low velocity impact damage resistance of sandwich plates , 2005 .

[7]  Jose Maria Kenny,et al.  Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation , 2000 .

[8]  Dai Gil Lee,et al.  Failure Modes of Foam Core Sandwich Beams under Static and Impact Loads , 2004 .

[9]  A. G. Gibson,et al.  Low velocity perforation behaviour of polymer composite sandwich panels , 1998 .

[10]  C. Sun,et al.  Low velocity impact damage in composite sandwich beams , 1996 .

[11]  Impact Behaviour of Metal Foam Cored Sandwich Beams , 2006 .

[12]  Wesley J. Cantwell,et al.  The fracture properties of novel aluminum foam sandwich structures , 2000 .

[13]  Low-Velocity Impact Response of Polyurethane Foam Composite Sandwich Structures , 2004 .

[14]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites , 2000 .

[15]  Low velocity impact response of novel fiber-reinforced aluminum foam sandwich structures , 2003 .

[16]  G.A.O. Davies,et al.  Compression after impact strength of composite sandwich panels , 2004 .

[17]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Metallic Foams , 2000 .