R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE

We explore the link between a firm's organization of research - specifically, its choice to operate a centralized or decentralized R&D structure - and the type of innovation it produces. We propose that by reducing the internal transaction costs associated with R&D coordination across units, centralized R&D will generate innovations that have a larger and broader impact on subsequent technological evolution than will decentralized research. We also propose that by facilitating more distant (capabilities-broadening) search, centralized R&D will generate innovations that draw on a wider range of technologies. Our empirical results provide support for our predictions concerning impact, and mixed results for our predictions concerning breadth of search. We also find that control over research budgets complements direct authority relations in contributing to innovative impact. We propose several extensions of this research.

[1]  Peter W. Roberts,et al.  Product-line expansion and resource cannibalization , 2005 .

[2]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[3]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The global integration of business functions: a study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries , 2003 .

[4]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[5]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Informal and Formal Organization in New Institutional Economics , 2002 .

[6]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[8]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[9]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[10]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[11]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[12]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  How To Make Strategic Alliances Work , 2001 .

[13]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[14]  D. Teece.  Economic and sociological perspectives on diversification and organizational structure , 2000 .

[15]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[16]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Optimal scale for research and development in foreign environments—an investigation into size and performance of research and development laboratories abroad , 1998 .

[17]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[19]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[20]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[23]  Nicholas Argyres.  CAPABILITIES, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND DIVISIONALIZATION , 1996 .

[24]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[25]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination , 1995 .

[26]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[27]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[28]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[31]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[32]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[33]  William G. Egelhoff.  Information-Processing Theory and the Multinational Enterprise , 1991 .

[34]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[35]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Capitalism as an engine of progress , 1990 .

[36]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[37]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[39]  P. Klemperer.  How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be , 1990 .

[40]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[41]  M. Katz,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Competition , 1990 .

[42]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[43]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[44]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D , 1989 .

[45]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[46]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market , 1986 .

[47]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[48]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[49]  John T. Scott,et al.  Competition in an Open Economy: A Model Applied to Canada , 1980 .

[50]  E. Kitch,et al.  The Nature and Function of the Patent System , 1977, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[51]  R. Pitts.  Strategies And Structures For Diversification , 1977 .

[52]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[53]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[54]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[55]  A. Chandler,et al.  Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1962 .

[56]  Simon Kuznets,et al.  Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement , 1962 .