Subject-Exoskeleton Contact Model Calibration Leads to Accurate Interaction Force Predictions

Knowledge of human–exoskeleton interaction forces is crucial to assess user comfort and effectiveness of the interaction. The subject-exoskeleton collaborative movement and its interaction forces can be predicted in silico using computational modeling techniques. We developed an optimal control framework that consisted of three phases. First, the foot-ground (Phase A) and the subject-exoskeleton (Phase B) contact models were calibrated using three experimental sit-to-stand trials. Then, the collaborative movement and the subject-exoskeleton interaction forces, of six different sit-to-stand trials were predicted (Phase C). The results show that the contact models were able to reproduce experimental kinematics of calibration trials (mean root mean square differences - RMSD - coordinates ≤ 1.1° and velocities ≤ 6.8°/s), ground reaction forces (mean RMSD≤ 22.9 N), as well as the interaction forces at the pelvis, thigh, and shank (mean RMSD ≤ 5.4 N). Phase C could predict the collaborative movements of prediction trials (mean RMSD coordinates ≤ 3.5° and velocities ≤ 15.0°/s), and their subject-exoskeleton interaction forces (mean RMSD ≤ 13.1° N). In conclusion, this optimal control framework could be used while designing exoskeletons to have in silico knowledge of new optimal movements and their interaction forces.

[1]  Michael A Sherman,et al.  Simbody: multibody dynamics for biomedical research. , 2011, Procedia IUTAM.

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Instrumenting complex exoskeletons for improved human-robot interaction , 2015, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[3]  K. Harding,et al.  ABC of wound healing: Venous and arterial leg ulcers , 2006, BMJ.

[4]  Joost Geeroms,et al.  Mechatronic design of a sit-to-stance exoskeleton , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[5]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  Design of two lightweight, high-bandwidth torque-controlled ankle exoskeletons , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[6]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control , 2018, Mathematical Programming Computation.

[7]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Muscle-Driven Simulation of Human Gait , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Rachel W Jackson,et al.  Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking , 2017, Science.

[9]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons , 2008 .

[10]  Antonie J van den Bogert,et al.  Implicit methods for efficient musculoskeletal simulation and optimal control. , 2011, Procedia IUTAM.

[11]  Katja D. Mombaur,et al.  Predicting the Motions and Forces of Wearable Robotic Systems Using Optimal Control , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[12]  Katja D. Mombaur,et al.  Motion Optimization and Parameter Identification for a Human and Lower Back Exoskeleton Model , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[13]  Simona Crea,et al.  A Flexible Sensor Technology for the Distributed Measurement of Interaction Pressure , 2013, Sensors.

[14]  Tingfang Yan,et al.  Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[15]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Characterizing the Human Wrist for Improved Haptic Interaction , 2003 .

[16]  Ajay Seth,et al.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  S. Gard,et al.  Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  Evaluation of Direct Collocation Optimal Control Problem Formulations for Solving the Muscle Redundancy Problem , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Interaction Force Modeling for Joint Misalignment Minimization Toward Bio-Inspired Knee Exoskeleton Design , 2018 .

[20]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Predicting Seat-Off and Detecting Start-of-Assistance Events for Assisting Sit-to-Stand With an Exoskeleton , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[21]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Optimal excitation and identification of the dynamic model of robotic systems with compliant actuators , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[22]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Sensing Pressure Distribution on a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Physical Human-Machine Interface , 2010, Sensors.

[24]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  State of the Art and Future Directions for Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Sippe G. Douma,et al.  Identification of Parameters in Large Scale Physical Model Structures, for the Purpose of Model-Based Operations , 2009 .

[26]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..