Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

Histologic analysis of the allograft biopsy specimen is the standard method used to differentiate rejection from other injury in kidney transplants. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive test of allograft injury that may enable more frequent, quantitative, and safer assessment of allograft rejection and injury status. To investigate this possibility, we prospectively collected blood specimens at scheduled intervals and at the time of clinically indicated biopsies. In 102 kidney recipients, we measured plasma levels of dd-cfDNA and correlated the levels with allograft rejection status ascertained by histology in 107 biopsy specimens. The dd-cfDNA level discriminated between biopsy specimens showing any rejection (T cell-mediated rejection or antibody-mediated rejection [ABMR]) and controls (no rejection histologically), P<0.001 (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.86). Positive and negative predictive values for active rejection at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 61% and 84%, respectively. The AUC for discriminating ABMR from samples without ABMR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Positive and negative predictive values for ABMR at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 44% and 96%, respectively. Median dd-cfDNA was 2.9% (ABMR), 1.2% (T cell-mediated types ≥IB), 0.2% (T cell-mediated type IA), and 0.3% in controls (P=0.05 for T cell-mediated rejection types ≥IB versus controls). Thus, dd-cfDNA may be used to assess allograft rejection and injury; dd-cfDNA levels <1% reflect the absence of active rejection (T cell-mediated type ≥IB or ABMR) and levels >1% indicate a probability of active rejection.

[1]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Validation of a Clinical-Grade Assay to Measure Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. , 2016, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[2]  M. Haas,et al.  The Revised (2013) Banff Classification for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts: Update, Difficulties, and Future Considerations , 2016, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  D. Abramowicz,et al.  Cell‐Free DNA: An Upcoming Biomarker in Transplantation , 2015, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[4]  J. Gummert,et al.  Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Is a Novel Universal Biomarker for Allograft Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation. , 2015, Transplantation proceedings.

[5]  R. Bloom,et al.  Persistent BK viremia does not increase intermediate-term graft loss but is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  Lance R. Martin,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of infection and rejection after lung transplantation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  N. Neff,et al.  Circulating Cell-Free DNA Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis of Heart Transplant Rejection , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  A. Oliphant,et al.  Highly sensitive noninvasive cardiac transplant rejection monitoring using targeted quantification of donor-specific cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Matas,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Current Status and Novel Approaches , 2014, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[10]  P. Walson,et al.  Digital droplet PCR for rapid quantification of donor DNA in the circulation of transplant recipients as a potential universal biomarker of graft injury. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Josef Coresh,et al.  Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Jiang,et al.  High-resolution profiling of fetal DNA clearance from maternal plasma by massively parallel sequencing. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  J. Qin,et al.  A New Blood Collection Device Minimizes Cellular DNA Release During Sample Storage and Shipping When Compared to a Standard Device , 2013, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[14]  X. Jouven,et al.  Antibody-mediated vascular rejection of kidney allografts: a population-based study , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Josephson Monitoring and managing graft health in the kidney transplant recipient. , 2011, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[16]  S. Quake,et al.  Universal noninvasive detection of solid organ transplant rejection , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  D. Rush,et al.  Lack of Benefit of Early Protocol Biopsies in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving TAC and MMF: A Randomized Study , 2007, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[18]  S. Wieand,et al.  Analysis of repeated markers used to predict progression of cancer. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  N. M. Hjelm,et al.  Presence of donor-specific DNA in plasma of kidney and liver-transplant recipients , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  A. Wu,et al.  Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[21]  G. Einecked,et al.  Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology : Updates and Future Directions , 2008 .