Stealth Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Control

Publisher Summary Stealth interventions can take multiple forms. As demonstrated in interventions to reduce children's screen time, emphasis is placed on incentives for the process of behavior change rather than outcomes, by using frames to enhance intrinsic motivation such as perceived choice and control, individualization, fantasy and contextualization, challenge, curiosity, and cooperation and competition. These design features make the process of behavior change rewarding, easy, and desirable rather than a sacrifice or burden, as “diets” and “exercise” are often perceived to be. These same approaches can be applied to the design of other nutrition and physical activity interventions to raise the incentive value of participation, rather than trying to persuade participants to change through reason and logical arguments. Taking stealth interventions to the next level is to identify or structure health-promoting environments and activities that are motivating in themselves. As shown, after-school ethnic dance classes for girls can redefine sustained moderate to vigorous exercise (with its perspiration, fatigue, and soreness) as a highly rewarding and fun, cultural, social, artistic, and political activity. These interventions are designed such that, from the perspective of the participants, physical activity, diet, and weight changes are positive side effects of their participation, rather than the primary motivators. Finally, the next logical step for the stealth intervention approach is to harness the motivational appeal of existing and emerging social and ideological movements, to achieve greater and more sustained effects on behavior.

[1]  Darrell M. Wilson,et al.  Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African-American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. , 2003, Ethnicity & disease.

[2]  T. Robinson,et al.  Team sports for overweight children: the Stanford Sports to Prevent Obesity Randomized Trial (SPORT). , 2008, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[3]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[4]  A. Kriska,et al.  Decline in physical activity in black girls and white girls during adolescence. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  W. Quin Yow,et al.  Intrinsic motivation in education , 2008 .

[6]  G. Barsh,et al.  Is the energy homeostasis system inherently biased toward weight gain? , 2003, Diabetes.

[7]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[8]  T N Robinson,et al.  Reducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, JAMA.

[9]  R. Brownson,et al.  What lessons have been learned from other attempts to guide social change? , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[10]  T. Robinson,et al.  Effects of the SMART Classroom Curriculum to Reduce Child and Family Screen Time , 2006 .

[11]  C. Summerbell,et al.  Interventions for treating obesity in children. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  T. Robinson,et al.  What Can We Do to Control Childhood Obesity? , 2008 .

[13]  J. Halaas,et al.  Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals , 1998, Nature.

[14]  R. Flores,et al.  Dance for health: improving fitness in African American and Hispanic adolescents. , 1995, Public health reports.

[15]  S. Atran Genesis of Suicide Terrorism , 2003, Science.

[16]  T. Robinson,et al.  Preventing childhood obesity: a solution-oriented research paradigm. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  Meghan L Butryn,et al.  Behavioral treatment of obesity. , 2005, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[18]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.