Robust bounds on choosing from large tournaments

Tournament solutions provide methods for selecting the "best" alternatives from a tournament and have found applications in a wide range of areas. Previous work has shown that several well-known tournament solutions almost never rule out any alternative in large random tournaments. Nevertheless, all analytical results thus far have assumed a rigid probabilistic model, in which either a tournament is chosen uniformly at random, or there is a linear order of alternatives and the orientation of all edges in the tournament is chosen with the same probabilities according to the linear order. In this work, we consider a significantly more general model where the orientation of different edges can be chosen with different probabilities. We show that a number of common tournament solutions, including the top cycle and the uncovered set, are still unlikely to rule out any alternative under this model. This corresponds to natural graph-theoretic conditions such as irreducibility of the tournament. In addition, we provide tight asymptotic bounds on the boundary of the probability range for which the tournament solutions select all alternatives with high probability.

[1]  K. Brooks Reid Every vertex a king , 1982, Discret. Math..

[2]  T. Schjelderup-Ebbe,et al.  Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. , 1922 .

[3]  J. Moon Topics on tournaments , 1968 .

[4]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Monotonicity of ‘ranking by choosing’: A progress report , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..

[5]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Tournament Solutions , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[6]  Lawrence G. Sager Handbook of Computational Social Choice , 2015 .

[7]  Ove Frank,et al.  Stochastic Competition Graphs , 1968 .

[8]  Mark Fey,et al.  Choosing from a large tournament , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[9]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Robust bounds on choosing from large tournaments , 2020, Social choice and welfare.

[10]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[11]  Stephen B. Maurer The King Chicken Theorems , 1980 .

[12]  Alex D. Scott,et al.  The minimal covering set in large tournaments , 2012, Soc. Choice Welf..

[13]  Federico Poloni Of Note , 2009 .

[14]  P. Slater Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons , 1961 .

[15]  H. Landau On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: III The condition for a score structure , 1953 .

[16]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Who Can Win a Single-Elimination Tournament? , 2015, AAAI.

[17]  L. Moser,et al.  Almost all Tournaments are Irreducible , 1962, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin.

[18]  Jennifer Ryan,et al.  Tournament games and positive tournaments , 1995, J. Graph Theory.

[19]  Virginia Vassilevska Williams Fixing a Tournament , 2010, AAAI.

[20]  Olivier Hudry,et al.  A survey on the complexity of tournament solutions , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[21]  Nicholas R. Miller,et al.  Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting* , 1977 .

[22]  T. Schwartz Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum , 1972 .

[23]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making , 1986 .

[24]  Nicholas R. Miller A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting , 1980 .

[25]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Felix Brandt,et al.  On the Discriminative Power of Tournament Solutions , 2014, OR.

[27]  Andrzej Rucinski,et al.  On the evolution of a random tournament , 1996, Discret. Math..

[28]  Colin E Bell,et al.  A Random Voting Graph Almost Surely Has a Hamiltonian Cycle When the Number of Alternatives Is Large , 1981 .

[29]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  Tournament Solutions And Majority Voting , 1997 .

[30]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  In Silico Voting Experiments , 2010 .

[31]  Felix Brandt,et al.  On the structure of stable tournament solutions , 2016, Economic Theory.

[32]  H. Moulin Choosing from a tournament , 1986 .

[33]  I. Good A note on condorcet sets , 1971 .