Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structures with cohesive and granular backfills

The failure mechanisms of reinforced soil segmental walls with extensible reinforcements were studied by performing a numerical analysis using the finite element method. The numerical approach was first verified against the results of three instrumented full-scale structures reported in the literature. Finite element models with different combinations of reinforcement spacing, reinforcement length and backfill soil were analysed. The � -c reduction method, which is a special shear strength parameter reduction technique, was applied to simulate the failure conditions. The results of � -c reduction analysis were used to evaluate assumptions used in current design procedures for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. In particular, shear strains were used to identify failure surfaces. Interpretation of the results indicated that, for both granular and cohesive backfills, the potential failure surface gradually shifts to a direct sliding mode as the system approaches failure. As a result, under working loads the potential failure surface used in current design analysis is correct, but the failure plane of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil-retaining wall at failure approaches a direct sliding type or a bilinear plane, which starts from the toe of the wall with a very shallow slope.

[1]  Victor Elias,et al.  Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines , 1997 .

[2]  C. Yoo,et al.  Effect of foundation yielding on performance of two-tier geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining walls: a numerical investigation , 2006 .

[3]  Kianoosh Hatami,et al.  Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions , 2005 .

[4]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Reinforced Soil Structures with Poorly Draining Backfills. Part I: Reinforcement Interactions and Functions , 1994 .

[5]  N. Janbu Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests , 1963 .

[6]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SLOPES : LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSES , 1994 .

[7]  Jorge G. Zornberg,et al.  Field monitoring evaluation of geotextile-reinforced soil-retaining walls , 2007 .

[8]  D. Leshchinsky,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Geosynthetic Spacing on Failure Mechanisms in MSE Block Walls , 2001 .

[9]  P Rimoldi A REVIEW OF FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF GEOGRID REINFORCED SLOPES AND WALLS ---PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF EARTH REINFORCEMENT, FUKUOKA, KYUSHU, JAPAN, 5-7 OCTOBER 1988 , 1988 .

[10]  J W Billiard,et al.  Load test of a large-scale geotextile-reinforced retaining wall , 1991 .

[11]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  DESIGN MANUAL FOR SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS , 1993 .

[12]  Kianoosh Hatami,et al.  Numerical Model for Reinforced Soil Segmental Walls under Surcharge Loading , 2006 .

[13]  T. S. Ingold Earth reinforcement practice: Edited by Hidetoshi Ochiai, Shigenori Hayashi & Jun Otani. A. A. Balkeema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. 1016 pp. Price £87.00 (Volumes 1&2), hardbound. ISBN 0-90-5410-093-1 , 1994 .

[14]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Full Scale Testing of Geosynthetic Reinforced Walls , 2000 .

[15]  J. M. Duncan,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils , 1970 .