Investigating the Perceptual Effects of Multi-rate Stimulation in Cochlear Implants and the Development of a Tuned Multi-rate Sound Processing Strategy

Investigating the Perceptual Effects of Multi-rate Stimulation in Cochlear Implants and the Development of a Tuned Multi-rate Sound Processing Strategy

[1]  L. Moses,et al.  “Non‐parametric Statistics for Psychological Research.” , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H J McDermott,et al.  The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P PIALOUX,et al.  [The external ear]. , 1955, Les Annales d'oto-laryngologie.

[4]  Nicolas Grimault,et al.  Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  H J McDermott,et al.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Anastasios Sarampalis,et al.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report , 2006, Hearing Research.

[7]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Andreas Büchner,et al.  Fundamental Frequency Coding in NofM Strategies for Cochlear Implants , 2005 .

[9]  Walter A. Rosenblith,et al.  The Early History of Hearing—Observations and Theories , 1948 .

[10]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  James F Patrick,et al.  The Development of the Nucleus® Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[12]  N. Umeda.  Consonant duration in American English , 1977 .

[13]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  The effect of frequency estimation on speech recognition using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant , 2007, Hearing Research.

[15]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  A novel acoustic simulation of cochlear implant hearing: effects of temporal fine structure , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[16]  C S Throckmorton,et al.  Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[18]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Melodic Contour Identification by Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[21]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Charles W. Bray,et al.  The nature of acoustic response: The relation between sound frequency and frequency of impulses in the auditory nerve , 1930 .

[24]  D K Eddington,et al.  Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tympani electrodes in deaf volunteers. , 1978, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[25]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[26]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[27]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[28]  Markus Brunner,et al.  Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  H J McDermott,et al.  The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Concurrent Sound Segregation in Electric and Acoustic Hearing , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[31]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[32]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing , 2002, Hearing Research.

[34]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[35]  J. Knutson,et al.  The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. , 2003, Journal of music therapy.

[36]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Nucleus® 24 Advanced Encoder Conversion Study: Performance versus Preference , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[39]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[40]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[41]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Representation of fine structure or fine frequency information with cochlear implants , 2004 .

[42]  L H Mens,et al.  Predictors of cochlear implant performance. , 1999, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[43]  V. Vaidyanathan,et al.  ALA-induced fluorescence in the canine oral cavity. , 2006, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[44]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[45]  P.C. Laizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[46]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: Implications for cochlear implants , 2006, Hearing Research.

[47]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Improved Music Perception with Explicit Pitch Coding in Cochlear Implants , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[48]  P J Blamey,et al.  Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Robert Alexander Fearn,et al.  MUSIC AND PITCH PERCEPTION OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS , 2001 .

[50]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Detecting pitch-pulse asynchronies and differences in fundamental frequency. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[54]  D.B. Grayden,et al.  A cochlear implant speech processing strategy based on an auditory model , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, 2004..

[55]  C S Throckmorton,et al.  Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Andrea Nobbe,et al.  Pitch perception and signal processing in electric hearing (Tonhöhenwahrnehmung und Signalverarbeitung bei elektrischem Hören) , 2004 .

[58]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[59]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Differences in frequency modulation detection and fundamental frequency discrimination between complex tones consisting of resolved and unresolved harmonics , 1995 .

[60]  B. Moore.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  F. Zeng.  Trends in Cochlear Implants , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[62]  P. Moran.  On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.

[63]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[64]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[65]  N. Umeda.  Vowel duration in American English. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Factors Predicting Postoperative Sentence Scores in Postlinguistically Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Patients , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[67]  J G Clark,et al.  Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. , 1981, ASHA.

[68]  Brian Roberts,et al.  Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners , 2007, Hearing Research.

[69]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Multicenter U.S. Bilateral MED-EL Cochlear Implantation Study: Speech Perception over the First Year of Use , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[70]  Christopher Turner,et al.  Accuracy of Cochlear Implant Recipients on Pitch Perception, Melody Recognition, and Speech Reception in Noise , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[71]  R. Shannon,et al.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  HiResolutionTM and Conventional Sound Processing in the HiResolutionTM Bionic Ear: Using Appropriate Outcome Measures to Assess Speech Recognition Ability , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[73]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Hearing: Physiological Acoustics, Neural Coding, and Psychoacoustics , 1989 .

[74]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  J Wouters,et al.  A concept for a research tool for experiments with cochlear implant users. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  D. Hilbert.  Grundzuge Einer Allgemeinen Theorie Der Linearen Integralgleichungen , 2009 .

[77]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  K. Plant,et al.  Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[79]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[80]  Robert V Shannon,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[81]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic model. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[82]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[83]  Mark Downing,et al.  Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[84]  P C Loizou,et al.  Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[85]  H J McDermott,et al.  Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[86]  S. S. Stevens.  The Relation of Pitch to Intensity , 1935 .

[87]  G M Clark,et al.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[88]  P C Loizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[89]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Developing a Flexible SPEAR3-Based Psychophysical Research Platform for Testing Cochlear Implant Users , 2008 .

[90]  Mahesh Viswanathan,et al.  Measuring speech quality for text-to-speech systems: development and assessment of a modified mean opinion score (MOS) scale , 2005, Comput. Speech Lang..

[91]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[92]  S Pijl.  Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[93]  Xin Luo,et al.  Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[94]  H J McDermott,et al.  The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[95]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[96]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[97]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A Comparison of Two Loudness Balancing Tasks in Cochlear Implant Subjects Using Bipolar Stimulation , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[98]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Investigating the influence of pulse rate and duration on pitch perception in cochlear implants , 2008 .

[99]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[100]  Marc Moonen,et al.  A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[101]  R V Shannon,et al.  A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[102]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[103]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Pitch discrimination of patterned electric stimulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[104]  B J Gantz,et al.  Previous experience as a confounding factor in comparing cochlear-implant processing schemes. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[105]  L M Collins,et al.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[106]  Robert S Hong,et al.  Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.