Correlation of Age and HRT Use with Breast Density as Assessed by Quantra™

Breast density is a significant predictor in the risk of developing breast cancer. Several methods are available for assessing breast density, but most are subject to intra‐observer variability and are unable to assess the breast as a three‐dimensional structure. Using Quantra™ to quantify breast density, we have correlated this with risk factors to determine what impact these variables have on breast density. Women attending for full field digital mammography at the South West London Breast Screening Unit between December 2008 and March 2009 were invited to participate in the study by questionnaire. Consenting women returned the questionnaire allowing further data collection including demographics, menopausal status and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. Data were correlated against breast density measurements to determine the degree of association. Mammograms were assessed on a Hologic™ workstation and breast density calculated using Quantra™. Quantra™ is an automated algorithm for volumetric assessment of breast tissue composition from digital mammograms. Six‐hundred and eighty‐three women were invited to participate. Those with implants or mastectomy were excluded. Three‐hundred and twenty questionnaires were fully completed and able to be assessed. The mean age of participants was 59 years (range 49–81). Mean density was 19.7% (range 8.5–48.5%). There was a decrease in density with age (Pearson product‐moment correlation coefficient −0.17). Correlation between density and HRT use showed a significant positive result (correlation coefficient 0.07). Quantra™ has shown to be an accurate, reproducible tool for quantifying breast density, demonstrated by its correlation with lifestyle and demographic data. Given its ease of acquisition this may be the future of breast density quantification in the digital age.

[1]  Anne M Kavanagh,et al.  Using Mammographic Density to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  N F Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  S. Cummings,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in a Screening Population , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  D. Easton,et al.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  N. Rahman,et al.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[6]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  John A Shepherd,et al.  Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  Ki Keun Oh,et al.  Mammographic Evaluation of Suspicious Malignant Lesions Based on ACR(American College of Radiology) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System( BI-RADS ) , 1999 .

[9]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  N. Boyd,et al.  Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  E B Larson,et al.  Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern. , 1995, Radiology.

[13]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[15]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.