Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion

In an effort to clean up user comment sections, news organizations have turned to Facebook, the world's largest social network site, as a way to make users more identifiable and accountable for the content they produce. It is hypothesized that users leaving comments via their Facebook profile will be less likely to engage in uncivil and impolite discussion, even when it comes to discussing politically sensitive and potentially divisive issues. By analysing the content of discussion as it occurs in response to political news content on the Washington Post Facebook, and comparing it to that which occurs on the Washington Post website where users are afforded a relatively high level of anonymity, the present study determines the extent to which Facebook increases the level of civility and impoliteness in an area of political discussion renowned for uncivil and impolite communicative behaviour. In line with earlier theories of social interaction, the paper finds that political discussion on The Washington Post website is significantly more likely to be uncivil than discussion of the same content on the Washington Post Facebook page. Moreover, the incivility and impoliteness on the Washington Post website are significantly more likely to be directed towards other participants in the discussion compared to The Washington Post Facebook page.

[1]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[2]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[3]  G. L. Bon,et al.  Scientific Literature: The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind , 1897 .

[4]  A. Jacovides Letter To The Editor Of The New York Times , 2011 .

[5]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[6]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[7]  C. Wolf,et al.  Viral Hate: Containing Its Spread on the Internet , 2013 .

[8]  Stephen Macedo,et al.  Deliberative politics : essays on democracy and disagreement , 1999 .

[9]  Pablo Boczkowski,et al.  Understanding the Development of Online Newspapers , 1999, New Media Soc..

[10]  T. Massaro,et al.  Freedom of Speech, Liberal Democracy, and Emerging Evidence on Civility and Effective Democratic Engagement , 2012 .

[11]  Anastasia Kavada,et al.  Engagement, bonding, and identity across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace , 2012 .

[12]  J. Burkell,et al.  Facebook: public space, or private space? , 2014 .

[13]  Charles Ess,et al.  The handbook of internet studies , 2011 .

[14]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains From Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions , 2005 .

[15]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[16]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Political Discussion Online , 2011 .

[17]  Todd Graham,et al.  In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions , 2003 .

[18]  Nancy K. Baym,et al.  Personal Connections in the Digital Age , 1994 .

[19]  M. Schudson,et al.  Why conversation is not the soul of democracy , 1997 .

[20]  Elizabeth S. Smith,et al.  Who Taught You to Talk Like That?: The University and Online Political Discourse , 2013 .

[21]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  New Voices in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Political Talk , 2002 .

[22]  Jennifer Brundidge Encountering "Difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks , 2010 .

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .

[25]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings , 2011, New Media Soc..

[26]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization , 2014, CSCW.

[27]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[29]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  DELIBERATIVENESS OF ONLINE POLITICAL DISCUSSION , 2008 .

[30]  P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[31]  Arthur D. Santana Online Readers' Comments Represent New Opinion Pipeline , 2011 .

[32]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Democracy for some? How political talk both informs and polarizes the electorate , 2001 .

[33]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[34]  Jay D. Hmielowski,et al.  Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor , 2012 .

[35]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[36]  Lily Canter,et al.  THE MISCONCEPTION OF ONLINE COMMENT THREADS , 2013 .

[37]  Hangwoo Lee Behavioral Strategies for Dealing with Flaming in An Online Forum , 2005 .

[38]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[39]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[40]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[41]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers , 2011 .

[42]  Jennifer Gibbs,et al.  Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[44]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[45]  Arthur D. Santana Virtuous or Vitriolic , 2014 .

[46]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[47]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[48]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Edith Manosevitch,et al.  Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation , 2009 .