Bibliometric Indices of Scientific Journals: Time to overcome the obsession and think beyond the Impact Factor.

Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has been widely used for a long time as a proxy marker of journal prestige. However, off late, accuracy and reliability of JIF for evaluation of scientific journals has been increasingly questioned by numerous stakeholders in the field of scholarly publications. Having realized the perils and pitfalls of JIF, there is an increasing understanding among academia to develop and consider alternatives to the traditional JIF. It is possibly time for all concerned to understand the pros and cons of JIF to overcome this obsession. Limitations of JIF and possible alternative and emerging bibliometric indicators are being discussed in this article for the benefit of the readers of MJAFI.

[1]  L. Waltman,et al.  A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  A proposal for a novel impact factor as an alternative to the JCR impact factor , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[3]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[4]  Armen Yuri Gasparyan,et al.  The Journal Impact Factor: Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.

[5]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Eigenfactor™ Metrics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Mehdi Dadkhah,et al.  Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics , 2016, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[7]  Jalalian Mehrdad.  The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. , 2015 .

[8]  Andrew J Stewart Coats,et al.  Impact Factor: Vagaries, inconsistencies and illogicalities; should it be abandoned? , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  Ramin Sadeghi,et al.  Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals , 2014, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[11]  The Journal Impact Factor is under attack – use the CAPCI factor instead , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[12]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.