Entropy-Based Weights for MultiCriteria Spatial Decision-Making

This paper presents an integration of entropy-based weights and a modified TOPSIS algorithm within a GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Geospatial multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems typically involve a set of spatially feasible alternatives that are evaluated by multiple and conflicting evaluation criteria that vary in importance to the decision-maker(s). However, often in complex spatial decision-making problems the decision-maker(s) may be unable or unwilling to provide cohesive and exact numerical judgments regarding the relative importance or weights of criteria. An entropy-based object weighting scheme determines the weights for a set of criteria by quantifying the amount of information within the decision matrix and based on evaluation values. Information entropy is a measure of the degree of disorder within a system. It can quantify the amount of expected and useful information content within criterion values, and it measures the contrast intensity among a set of spatial criteria. This paper will present the implementation of entropy-based weights within a vector-based spatial problem for calculating the Heat Vulnerability Index within San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles.

[1]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  Strategic decision making : multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets : instructor's manual , 1996 .

[2]  Joel Schwartz,et al.  Mapping Community Determinants of Heat Vulnerability , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  A. Jessop Entropy in multiattribute problems , 1999 .

[4]  Patricia A. Berger Generating Agricultural Landscapes for Alternative Futures Analysis: A Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Model , 2006, Trans. GIS.

[5]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[7]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[8]  B. Hobbs A COMPARISON OF WEIGHTING METHODS IN POWER PLANT SITING , 1980 .

[9]  Jing-nan Sun,et al.  Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[10]  Bruce E. Barrett,et al.  Decision quality using ranked attribute weights , 1996 .

[11]  Ronnie Johansson,et al.  Utilization of Multi Attribute Decision Making Techniques to Integrate Automatic and Manual Ranking of Options , 2014, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[12]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science , 2001 .

[13]  Olga V. Wilhelmi,et al.  Intra-urban societal vulnerability to extreme heat: the role of heat exposure and the built environment, socioeconomics, and neighborhood stability. , 2011, Health & place.

[14]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[16]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2010 .

[18]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[20]  Jingwen Huang Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method For information system selection , 2008, ICAL 2008.

[21]  Claus Rinner,et al.  The Role of Maps in Neighborhood-level Heat Vulnerability Assessment for the City of Toronto , 2010 .

[22]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods , 2000 .