Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change

Abstract We explore the nature of change when firms engage in business process redesign (i.e., reengineering). According to the proponents, business process redesign is an all-or-nothing affair. Numerous books and articles on the topic promulgate the notion that reengineering is nothing short of a revolution. But the rhetoric can be daunting—and may mislead managers planning to reengineer their organizations. Our field research on 15 business process redesign projects suggests that only one of the two phases of reengineering effort needs to be revolutionary for the project to reach field implementation. Reengineering involves both the design—the blueprint for change—and the implementation of those plans. Reengineering design phase must have elements of radical change. The radicalness instills motivation in ways that more evolutionary projects cannot. But as companies implement the plans, they can—and many do—use a more evolutionary change process, and still gain effective results. Our results provide support to the emerging body of literature that argues that organizations combine evolutionary and radical change harmoniously.

[1]  T. Jick,et al.  Managing Change: Cases and Concepts , 1992 .

[2]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  CHANGING EVERYTHING ALL AT ONCE: WORK LIFE AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. , 1987 .

[3]  Steven A. Stanton Michael Hammer.  The Reengineering Revolution , 1996 .

[4]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Business reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: experiences and lessons learned from the first five years , 1994 .

[5]  J. Pfeffer.  Competitive Advantage Through People , 1994 .

[6]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[7]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  The Reality of Business Reengineering: Pacific Bell's Centrex Provisioning Process , 1996 .

[8]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Flexibility in Manufacturing , 1995 .

[9]  E. Clemons.  Using Scenario Analysis to Manage the Strategic Risks of Reengineering , 1995 .

[10]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[11]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[12]  C. Gersick.  Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture , 1994 .

[13]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[14]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[15]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[17]  John J. Sviokla.  Knowledge Workers and Radically New Technology , 2000 .

[18]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Implementing Radical Change: Gradual Versus Rapid Pace , 2018, ICIS.

[20]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[21]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[22]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Business Process Redesign: Tactics for Managing Radical Change , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  E. A. Hall,et al.  How to Make Reengineering Really Work , 1994 .