Similar perceptual costs for dividing attention between retina- and space-centered targets in humans.

Visual-spatial attention enhances the perception of behaviorally relevant stimuli. One issue that remains unclear is whether attention is preferentially allocated to stimuli that remain fixed in one reference frame (e.g., retina-centered), or whether it could be equally allocated to stimuli fixed in other frames. We investigated this issue by asking observers to covertly attend to sinusoidal gratings fixed in different reference frames and to discriminate changes in their orientation. First, we quantified orientation discrimination thresholds (ODTs) while subjects pursued a moving dot and either attended to a retina- or a space-centered grating. We then measured ODTs while subjects divided attention between the two gratings. We found that dividing attention proportionally increased ODTs for both target gratings relative to the focused attention condition. Second, we used the same stimulus configuration and conditions during a fixation task. Here, one grating was retina- and space-centered while the other moved in space and on the retina. Again, ODTs during divided attention proportionally increased for both gratings. These increases were similar to those measured during smooth pursuit. Our results show that humans can proportionally divide attention between targets centered in different reference frames during both smooth pursuit eye movements and fixations.

[1]  R. John Leigh,et al.  Evaluation of a video tracking device for measurement of horizontal and vertical eye rotations during locomotion , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  P. van Donkelaar,et al.  Spatiotemporal modulation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[3]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[4]  M. Land.  Motion and vision: why animals move their eyes , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Maps of Visual Space in Human Occipital Cortex Are Retinotopic, Not Spatiotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  James T Enns,et al.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal responses in macaque MT and VIP during motion detection , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Paul van Donkelaar,et al.  Spatiotemporal modulation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1999 .

[11]  D. Melcher.  Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Temporal contrast sensitivity during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[14]  C R Olson,et al.  Object-centered direction selectivity in the macaque supplementary eye field , 1995, Science.

[15]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[17]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Laurent Madelain,et al.  Spatial deployment of attention influences both saccadic and pursuit tracking , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  Smooth pursuit eye movements and perception share target selection, but only some central resources , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Zohary,et al.  Rapid Formation of Spatiotopic Representations As Revealed by Inhibition of Return , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  M T Swanston,et al.  A General Model for the Perception of Space and Motion , 1996, Perception.

[24]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[27]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Effects of attention shifts to stationary objects during steady-state smooth pursuit eye movements , 2008, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Bradshaw,et al.  Endogenous Shifts of Covert Attention Operate within Multiple Coordinate Frames: Evidence from a Feature-Priming Task , 2003, Perception.

[29]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shared attentional control of smooth eye movement and perception , 1986, Vision Research.

[30]  Richard J. Krauzlis,et al.  Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements , 2009, Vision Research.

[31]  P. Thier,et al.  Posterior Parietal Cortex Neurons Encode Target Motion in World-Centered Coordinates , 2004, Neuron.

[32]  Peter Thier,et al.  The neural basis of smooth pursuit eye movements in the rhesus monkey brain , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  Visual discrimination of orientation statistics in crowded and uncrowded arrays. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  Karl R. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Object recognition during foveating eye movements , 2009, Vision Research.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  F. Bremmer,et al.  Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons , 1997, Nature.

[38]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  M Behrmann,et al.  Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  C. Genovese,et al.  Spatial Updating in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[41]  F. Duffy,et al.  Eye movement-related inhibition of primate visual neurons , 1975, Brain Research.

[42]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[43]  P. P. Battaglini,et al.  Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Environmentally defined frames of reference: their time course and sensitivity to spatial cues and attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Vernier in Motion: What Accounts for the Threshold Elevation? , 1996, Vision Research.

[47]  Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo,et al.  Frames of Reference for Eye-Head Gaze Commands in Primate Supplementary Eye Fields , 2004, Neuron.

[48]  P. van Donkelaar,et al.  The allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[49]  B. Julesz,et al.  Withdrawing attention at little or no cost: Detection and discrimination tasks , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  M. Bradshaw,et al.  Reflexive Shifts of Covert Attention Operate in an Egocentric Coordinate Frame , 2001, Perception.

[51]  Mario Ruiz-Ruiz,et al.  Human updating of visual motion direction during head rotations. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.