The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges.

The statistical parameters that influence the reliability of delta and residualized change were examined in the context of the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity. A comparison of the relative reliabilities of these two quantification methods was performed using systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate data from two samples of 134 and 109 subjects observed during baseline and either two or four behavioral challenges. The results indicated that both delta and residualized change scores can yield reliable measures of blood pressure and heart rate reactivity to behavioral challenges, and that their reliabilities will be comparable under the conditions observed in laboratory reactivity studies. Correlations between baseline and delta did not indicate that these two measures were systematically related. Finally, delta scores are more appropriate than residuals when assessing the generalizability of responses across a variety of tasks.

[1]  J. Lacey,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSES: TOWARD A GENERAL SOLUTION , 1956, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  B. C. Lacey,et al.  THE LAW OF INITIAL VALUE IN THE LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF AUTONOMIC CONSTITUTION: REPRODUCIBILITY OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSES AND RESPONSE PATTERNS OVER A FOUR‐YEAR INTERVAL * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Philip H. Dubois,et al.  Correlational Methods in Research on Human Learning , 1962 .

[4]  L. Benjamin,et al.  Facts and artifacts in using analysis of covariance to "undo" the law of initial values. , 1967, Psychophysiology.

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[6]  E. Simonson,et al.  Mortality and coronary heart disease among men studied for 23 years. , 1971, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Edward F. O’Connor,et al.  Extending Classical Test Theory to the Measurement of Change , 1972 .

[8]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting Periods , 1977 .

[9]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  GAIN SCORES IN RESEARCH CAN BE HIGHLY RELIABLE , 1982 .

[10]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  The relative error magnitude in three measures of change , 1982 .

[11]  S. Manuck,et al.  Behaviorally Induced Heart Rate Reactivity and Atherosclerosis in Cynomolgus Monkeys , 1983, Psychosomatic medicine.

[12]  L. Elveback,et al.  Cold pressor test as a predictor of hypertension. , 1984, Hypertension.

[13]  H. Rüddel,et al.  The standardized mental stress test protocol: test-retest reliability and comparison with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  Exaggerated psychophysiological reactivity: issues in quantification and reliability. , 1985, Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

[15]  K. K. Sharma,et al.  Optimum Reliability of Gain Scores. , 1986 .

[16]  M. Myrtek,et al.  The law of initial value: A rare exception , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[17]  Predictability of individual differences in activation processes in a field setting based on laboratory measures. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[18]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  How many blood pressure measurements are enough? An application of generalizability theory to the study of blood pressure reliability. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[19]  D. H. Vandercar,et al.  Microcomputer servo-controlled bicycle ergometer system for psychophysiological research. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[20]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Predicting home and work blood pressure measurements from resting baselines and laboratory reactivity in black and white Americans. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[21]  T. Pickering,et al.  Cardiovascular Reactivity in the Laboratory and the Role of Behavioral Factors in Hypertension: a Critical Review , 1990 .

[22]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Blood pressure reactivity and perception of pain during the forehead cold pressor test. , 1991, Psychophysiology.