Operating reserve policies with high wind power penetration

Abstract The rapid increase in installed wind generation capacity in the United States has raised concerns about electricity system reliability because of the intermittent and variable nature of the wind power. To help manage the wind power variability new ways of determining the amount of operating reserve capacity that must be kept available are necessary. A two-stage stochastic programming approach for the unit commitment problem had been introduced to mimic the short-term power operation decision process, i.e., day-ahead unit commitment and hour-ahead economic dispatch. Within this framework, a new formulation is proposed to determine the spinning and non-spinning reserve levels for large-scale systems over a 24-h optimization horizon with economic considerations. The proposed model is then applied to a large-scaled California test system. Simulation results illustrate the impact of stochastic wind power generation behavior and increased installed wind capacity on operating reserve requirements and the system cost as a whole.

[1]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Electric Energy Systems : Analysis and Operation , 2008 .

[2]  E. Hirst,et al.  Unbundling Electricity: Ancillary Services , 1996, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Value of storage in providing balancing services for electricity generation systems with high wind penetration , 2006 .

[4]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Estimating the Spinning Reserve Requirements in Systems With Significant Wind Power Generation Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[6]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Quantifying reserve demands due to increasing wind power penetration , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[7]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Volatile Wind Power Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  The effect of implementing wind power on overall electricity generation costs, CO2 emissions and reliability , 2007 .

[9]  Claudio A. Canizares,et al.  Frequency and Voltage Control , 2008 .

[10]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  A. Conejo,et al.  Economic Valuation of Reserves in Power Systems With High Penetration of Wind Power , 2009 .

[12]  W.L. Kling,et al.  Impacts of Wind Power on Thermal Generation Unit Commitment and Dispatch , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[13]  Yong Fu,et al.  Security-constrained unit commitment with AC constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  The Effects of Vehicle-to-Grid Systems on Wind Power Integration in California , 2010 .

[15]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Considerations on the backup of wind power: Operational backup , 2007 .

[16]  Timothy C. Green,et al.  Renewables and the grid: understanding intermittency , 2007 .

[17]  Eric Hirst,et al.  Costs for electric-power ancillary services , 1996 .

[18]  John M. Wilson,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[20]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  William T. Ziemba,et al.  Short Term Financial Planning under Uncertainty , 1982 .