Methodological decisions influence the identification of potential core outcomes in studies related to pre‐eclampsia: an analysis informing the development of  recommendations for future core outcome set developers

To quantify the effect of different methodological decisions on the identification of potential core outcomes to inform the development of recommendations for future core coutcome set developers.

[1]  A. Khalil,et al.  Increasing value and reducing research waste in obstetrics: towards woman‐centered research , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  A. Khalil,et al.  Variation in outcome reporting across studies evaluating interventions for selective fetal growth restriction , 2019, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

[3]  L. Hinton,et al.  What outcomes should researchers select, collect and report in pre‐eclampsia research? A qualitative study exploring the views of women with lived experience of pre‐eclampsia , 2019, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. Papageorghiou,et al.  Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies , 2018, Trials.

[6]  K. Hecher,et al.  Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin–twin transfusion syndrome , 2018, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  J. Duffy,et al.  A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research , 2018, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[8]  J. Duffy,et al.  A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set , 2018, International Urogynecology Journal.

[9]  S. Doumouchtsis,et al.  Do we need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating the management of childbirth trauma , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  A. Khalil,et al.  Outcome reporting across randomized trials and observational studies evaluating treatments for twin–twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review , 2018, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Reproductive medicine: still more ART than science? , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  N. L. Vuong,et al.  A protocol developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for infertility , 2018, Human reproduction open.

[13]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Inadequate safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  S. Ziebland,et al.  A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre‐eclampsia , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  K. Hecher,et al.  Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome: study protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set , 2017, Trials.

[17]  N. Modi,et al.  Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine , 2017, BMJ Paediatrics Open.

[18]  Angus G K McNair,et al.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 , 2017, Trials.

[19]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre‐eclampsia , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  Charlotte Kingsley,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures , 2017 .

[21]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Reducing research waste in benign gynaecology and fertility research , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  D. Grossman,et al.  Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): a protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for medical and surgical abortion☆ , 2017, Contraception.

[23]  K. Khan,et al.  Protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for endometriosis , 2016, BMJ Open.

[24]  S. Ziebland,et al.  A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia. , 2016, Pregnancy hypertension.

[25]  J. Duffy,et al.  Influence of methodology upon the identification of potential core outcomes: recommendations for core outcome set developers are needed , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  M. Plana,et al.  Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic review. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  G. Saade,et al.  A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  橋本 卓也.  留学体験記 (Imperial College London) , 2012 .

[30]  C. Smee,et al.  United Kingdom , 2000, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[31]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[32]  A. Khalil,et al.  Variation in outcome reporting across studies evaluating interventions for selective fetal growth restriction , 2019, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.