Sequestering Size: The Role of Allometry and Gender in Digital Human Modeling

Biologists are aware that sexual dimorphism can result from size differences, shape differences, and differences in the relationship between the two (allometry), but the digital human modeling community has not fully incorporated this knowledge into their design procedures. Using landmark-based geometric morphometric methods and data from the CAESAR survey, we demonstrate that sexual dimorphism between adult males and females is the result of size, shape, and allometry differences between the sexes. Human sexual dimorphism is therefore far more complicated than is represented by standard design procedures, implying that using extreme percentile humans in design confounds male and female allometric differences, and will likely not accommodate all individuals.

[1]  W. Jungers.  Aspects of size and scaling in primate biology with special reference to the locomotor skeleton , 1984 .

[2]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Quantitative assessment of human body shape using Fourier analysis , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  The CAESAR project: a 3-D surface anthropometry survey , 1999, Second International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.PR00062).

[4]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[5]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[6]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[7]  W. Jungers,et al.  Shape, relative size, and size‐adjustments in morphometrics , 1995 .

[8]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation , 1963 .

[11]  J. Gower.  Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[12]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  MORPHOMETRICS OF TROPHIC OSTEOLOGY IN THE THREESPINE STICKLEBACK, GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS , 1998 .

[13]  D. Adams,et al.  Body shape variation in relation to resource partitioning within cichlid trophic guilds coexisting along the rocky shore of Lake Malawi , 2003 .

[14]  L. Rue,et al.  Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika , 2001 .

[15]  A R Tilley,et al.  THE MEASURE OF MAN AND WOMAN , 1993 .

[16]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Standard Formula for the Uniform Shape Component in Landmark Data , 1996 .

[17]  C. Pantin.  Problems of Relative Growth , 1932, Nature.

[18]  F. Rohlf,et al.  NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.1: Owner manual , 1992 .

[19]  Antonio Rosas,et al.  Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR), Final Report. Volume 1. Summary , 2002 .

[21]  Fred L Bookstein,et al.  Computing the uniform component of shape variation. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[22]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Morphometric tools for landmark data , 1993 .

[23]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[24]  F. Rohlf.  Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces , 1999 .

[25]  Judy M. Vance,et al.  Image Warping of Three-Dimensional Body Scan Data , 2003 .

[26]  Melinda M. Cerney.  A Comparison of the Roles of Univariate and Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Data in the Description of Form , 2003 .

[27]  J. Tanner,et al.  The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden growth study. , 1976, Annals of human biology.

[28]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Spaces, Shape Components and the Effects of Linear Transformations , 1996 .

[29]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  Advances in Morphometrics , 1996, NATO ASI Series.