Mathematical modeling of first flush in highway storm runoff using genetic algorithm.

A mechanistic model was developed to predict the highway runoff pollutographs during precipitation events. Pollutants were assumed to be in two phases, attached to the pavement surface and mobile in the runoff water. Detachment and reattachment of contaminants were considered as rate-limited processes and the detachment rate was assumed to be a function of flow velocity by a power expression. The build-up of pollutants on the surface during the dry period between the storm events was also included in the model. Using measured pollutographs from three highly urbanized highway sites in Los Angeles, California, a hybrid genetic algorithm was used to estimate the model parameters for four different constituents including total suspended solids, oil and grease, dissolved copper, and particulate copper. The model was then validated by predicting pollutographs for the same site for a different monitoring season. Results revealed that estimated model parameters were different for particle-associated and dissolved constituents. These findings suggest different mechanisms governing the detachment of particle-associated and dissolved constituents from the surface. The results have also indicated that there is a linear build-up of pollutants during the dry period and the removal of pollutants during dry periods was insignificant. From these findings, it has been concluded that either the removal rate during the dry period is small or it is not proportional to the concentration of pollutants accumulated on the surface. In general, the build-up contaminant concentrations from the build-up model followed the same trend. However, in some cases the estimated and measured pollutograph did not closely match that may be due to some unknown factors affecting the build-up rates in the current model.

[1]  Roberto Serra,et al.  Applying Cellular Automata to Complex Environmental Problems: The Simulation of the Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils , 1999, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Anne Ng,et al.  Selection of genetic algorithm operators for river water quality model calibration , 2003 .

[3]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[4]  Craig J. Allan,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATION FOR HIGHWAY RUNOFF , 1998 .

[5]  M. Zug,et al.  Pollution wash-off modelling on impervious surfaces : Calibration, validation, transposition , 1999 .

[6]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  A hybrid genetic—instance based learning algorithm for CE-QUAL-W2 calibration , 2005 .

[7]  Timothy R. Ginn,et al.  Column and batch reactive transport experiment parameter estimation using a genetic algorithm , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  M. Barrett,et al.  Characterization of Highway Runoff in Austin, Texas, Area , 1998 .

[9]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[10]  Toshihiko Kawachi,et al.  Estimating groundwater recharge using the SMAR conceptual model calibrated by genetic algorithm , 2005 .

[11]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[12]  M Kayhanian,et al.  Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Michael K Stenstrom,et al.  Implications of a kinematic wave model for first flush treatment design. , 2006, Water research.

[14]  H. Gao,et al.  USE OF A GENETIC ALGORITHM AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING FOR CALIBRATION OF A HYDROLOGIC MODEL , 1998 .

[15]  M K Stenstrom,et al.  A new modeling approach for estimating first flush metal mass loading. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  C. Oldham,et al.  A preliminary model for predicting heavy metal contaminant loading from an urban catchment. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Ning Chien,et al.  Mechanics of sediment transport , 1999 .

[18]  A. Mulligan,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Calibrating Water Quality Models , 1998 .

[19]  Shu-Kai S. Fan,et al.  A genetic algorithm and a particle swarm optimizer hybridized with Nelder-Mead simplex search , 2006, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Michael K Stenstrom,et al.  Modeling of highway stormwater runoff. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Trevor M. Daniell,et al.  Assessing model calibration adequacy via global optimisation , 1999 .

[22]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[23]  Steve Borroum,et al.  IMPACT OF ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAY RUNOFF POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS , 2002 .

[24]  Q. J. Wang The Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to Calibrating Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models , 1991 .

[25]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Modeling components of hydrologic cycle , 1982 .

[26]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Modeling Fate and Transport of Roadside-Applied Herbicides , 2005 .

[27]  Masoud Kayhanian,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of Particle Size Distribution in Highway Runoff: Implications for Settling Tank Design , 2006 .

[28]  Quan J. Wang,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to optimise model parameters , 1997 .

[29]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating stormwater pollutant loads , 1998 .