Forecasting Regional to Global Plant Migration in Response to Climate Change

Abstract The rate of future climate change is likely to exceed the migration rates of most plant species. The replacement of dominant species by locally rare species may require decades, and extinctions may occur when plant species cannot migrate fast enough to escape the consequences of climate change. Such lags may impair ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration and clean water production. Thus, to assess global change, simulation of plant migration and local vegetation change by dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) is critical, yet fraught with challenges. Global vegetation models cannot simulate all species, necessitating their aggregation into plant functional types (PFTs). Yet most PFTs encompass the full spectrum of migration rates. Migration processes span scales of time and space far beyond what can be confidently simulated in DGVMs. Theories about climate change and migration are limited by inadequate data for key processes at short and long time scales and at small and large spatial scales. These theories must be enhanced to incorporate species-level migration and succession processes into a more comprehensive definition of PFTs.

[1]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores , 2004 .

[2]  S. Levin,et al.  Long‐distance biological transport processes through the air: can nature's complexity be unfolded in silico? , 2005 .

[3]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  A general model for simulating the effects of landscape heterogeneity and disturbance on community patterns , 2002 .

[5]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Toward a Causal Explanation of Plant Invasiveness: Seedling Growth and Life‐History Strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) Species , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process‐based modelling study , 2000 .

[7]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[8]  R. Moss,et al.  The regional impacts of climate change : an assessment of vulnerability , 1997 .

[9]  Ronald P. Neilson,et al.  Simulated changes in vegetation distribution under global warming , 1998 .

[10]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Defining the importance of including transient ecosystem responses to simulate C‐cycle dynamics in a global change model , 2000 .

[11]  L. F. J. O H N S T O N E,et al.  Non-equilibrium succession dynamics indicate continued northern migration of lodgepole pine , 2003 .

[12]  M. Burke,et al.  Deep undercooling of tissue water and winter hardiness limitations in timberline flora. , 1981, Plant physiology.

[13]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[14]  H. McAllister,et al.  Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[15]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS* , 2002 .

[16]  G. G. Hunter,et al.  Spread of exotic conifers on South Island rangelands. , 1984 .

[17]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States , 2003 .

[18]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[19]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The value of ecosystem services , 1998 .

[20]  A. Kirilenko,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Vegetation Response to Rapid Climate Change Using Bioclimatic Classification , 1998 .

[21]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[22]  H. Shugart,et al.  Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change , 1993 .

[23]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Ecosystems and Their Goods and Services , 2001 .

[24]  Mark W. Schwartz,et al.  Predicting the Potential Future Distribution of Four Tree Species in Ohio Using Current Habitat Availability and Climatic Forcing , 2001, Ecosystems.

[25]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[26]  R. Neilson A Model for Predicting Continental‐Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance , 1995 .

[27]  G. Müller,et al.  The Scientific Basis , 1995 .

[28]  J. Fragoso,et al.  LONG‐DISTANCE SEED DISPERSAL BY TAPIRS INCREASES SEED SURVIVAL AND AGGREGATES TROPICAL TREES , 2003 .

[29]  R. Neilson,et al.  Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California , 2003 .

[30]  M. Westoby,et al.  The Evolutionary ecology of seed size , 2000 .

[31]  H. Shugart,et al.  The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate , 1993, Nature.

[32]  W. Cramer,et al.  A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate , 1992 .

[33]  A. Hampe Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide , 2004 .

[34]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[35]  M. Loreau,et al.  A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability. , 2002 .

[36]  Michael L. Cain,et al.  Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal , 2003 .

[37]  Catherine Zabinski,et al.  Changes in geographical range resulting from greenhouse warming: effects on biodiversity in forests , 1992 .

[38]  James S. Clark,et al.  Invasion by Extremes: Population Spread with Variation in Dispersal and Reproduction , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[39]  D Hodrinson « Plant dispersal: the role of man » , 1998 .

[40]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation , 2003 .

[41]  José M. V. Fragoso,et al.  TAPIR-GENERATED SEED SHADOWS : SCALE-DEPENDENT PATCHINESS IN THE AMAZON RAIN FOREST , 1997 .

[42]  R. Jansson,et al.  Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Renée M. Bekker,et al.  Life-history traits of the Northwest European flora: The LEDA database , 2003 .

[44]  P. Richard,et al.  Post‐glacial vegetation migration in conterminous Montréal Lowlands, southern Québec , 2001 .

[45]  Patch scale aggregation of heterogeneous land surface cover for mesoscale meteorological models , 1997 .

[46]  Martin T. Sykes,et al.  Climate change, tree species distributions and forest dynamics: A case study in the mixed conifer/northern hardwoods zone of northern Europe , 1996 .

[47]  M. Davis,et al.  Dispersal versus climate: Expansion of Fagus and Tsuga into the Upper Great Lakes region , 1986, Vegetatio.

[48]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change , 1997 .

[49]  Michael L. Cain,et al.  ARE LONG‐DISTANCE DISPERSAL EVENTS IN PLANTS USUALLY CAUSED BY NONSTANDARD MEANS OF DISPERSAL? , 2003 .

[50]  Dr. Leendert van der Pijl Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants , 1983, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[51]  J. P. Grime Vegetation Functional Classification Systems as Approaches to Predicting and Quantifying Global Vegetation Change , 1993 .

[52]  The transient response of vegetation to climate change: A potential source of CO2 to the atmosphere , 1992 .

[53]  O. Tackenberg Modeling long‐distance dispersal of plant diaspores by wind , 2003 .

[54]  S. Levin,et al.  Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind , 2002, Nature.

[55]  Paul G. Risser,et al.  Global warming and biological diversity , 1992 .

[56]  M. Vellend,et al.  Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America , 2004, Oecologia.

[57]  A. Traveset,et al.  The ecology of seed dispersal. , 2000 .