Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland.

Abstract Uneven-sized forestry is gradually gaining popularity and acceptability also in the Nordic countries. This is because of the willingness of the public and some forest owners to avoid clear-fellings and pursue more near-nature forest structures. It has also been realized that the profitability of uneven-sized forestry may be competitive with even-aged forestry. In Finland, management of uneven-sized stands is hampered by the lack of information about the dynamics of such stands, and about the yield and profitability of uneven-sized forestry. This study developed models which allow managers to simulate the growth and yield of uneven-sized stands in Finland, making it possible to predict the yield and analyze the sustainability of different management options. The model set consists of individual-tree diameter increment, height and survival models, and a model for ingrowth. The modeling data consisted of two long-term field experiments of uneven-sized forest management, a set of temporary sample plots measured earlier for growth modeling purposes, and the sample plots of the third National Forest Inventory of Finland. The application area of the models covers all growing sites, all main tree species, and the whole surface area of Finland. According to the models, the sustainable harvest of a fertile ( Oxalis-Myrtillus site) uneven-sized Norway spruce forest varies between 5.5 and 7 m 3  ha −1  a −1 in Central Finland, depending on the length of the cutting cycle, stand density, and shape of the diameter distribution. It is profitable to harvest large diameter classes more heavily than small ones. Due to the large amount of data the models for diameter increment are highly significant and reliably show the growth level of trees in uneven-sized stands. The weakest models are the ingrowth models, which are based on a clearly smaller data set than the other models.

[1]  L. Lundqvist Changes in the stand structure on permanent Picea abies plots managed with single‐tree selection , 1993 .

[2]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. , 1980 .

[3]  K. O’Hara Dynamics and Stocking-Level Relationships of Multi-Aged Ponderosa Pine Stands , 1996 .

[4]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Modelling site quality and individual-tree growth in pure and mixed Pinus brutia stands in north-east Greece , 2008, Annals of Forest Science.

[5]  P. Snowdon,et al.  A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions , 1991 .

[6]  M. Zwieniecki,et al.  Social-structure dynamics in uneven-aged Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) regeneration under canopy at the Kaliszki Reserve, Kampinoski National Park (Poland). , 1990 .

[7]  O. Laiho,et al.  Diversity-oriented silviculture in the Boreal Zone of Europe , 1999 .

[8]  Hannu Hökkä,et al.  Models for predicting stand development in MELA System , 2002 .

[9]  Changhui Peng,et al.  Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future , 2000 .

[10]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Using Numerical Optimization for Specifying Individual-Tree Competition Models , 2000, Forest Science.

[11]  T. Pukkala,et al.  A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies , 1998 .

[12]  William R. Wykoff,et al.  A Basal Area Increment Model for Individual Conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1990, Forest Science.

[13]  D. C. West,et al.  Canopy-understory interaction effects on forest population structure , 1975 .

[14]  T. Verwijst,et al.  Tree population dynamics, stand structure and species composition in the montane virgin forest of Vallibäcken, northern Sweden , 1987, Vegetatio.

[15]  Annabel Porté,et al.  Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management , 2002 .

[16]  A. M. Aduradola Mr. A. O. Oladoye,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF SILVICULTURE , 2011 .

[17]  A. Kooijman,et al.  Species Replacement in the Bryophyte Layer in Mires: The Role of Water Type, Nutrient Supply and Interspecific Interactions , 1995 .

[18]  K. Gadow,et al.  Continuous cover forestry : assessment, analysis, scenarios , 2002 .

[19]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests , 1994 .

[20]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Using past growth to improve individual-tree diameter growth models for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. in Catalonia, north-east Spain , 2004 .

[21]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Tree-selection algorithms for optimizing thinning using a distance-dependent growth model , 1998 .

[22]  K. Eerikäinen,et al.  Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated forest stands of southern Finland , 2007 .

[23]  K. O’Hara SILVICULTURE FOR STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY : A NEW LOOK AT MULTIAGED SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[24]  Simulation of the development of Norway spruce stands using a transition matrix , 1988 .

[25]  T. Saksa,et al.  The Structure of Advanced Virgin Forests in Finland , 1991 .

[26]  J. Cancino,et al.  Stem Number Guide Curves for Uneven-Aged Forests Development and Limitations , 2002 .

[27]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Regeneration Pulses and Climate-Vegetation Interactions in Nonpyrogenic Boreal Scots Pine Stands , 1995 .

[28]  A. Kiviste,et al.  Construction of site index equations for Pinus sylvestris L. using permanent plot data in Sweden , 1997 .

[29]  Growth and yield model for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. in Catalonia, north-east Spain , 2004 .

[30]  A. Cajander,et al.  Forest types and their significance. , 1949 .

[31]  Y. Bergeron,et al.  Stand dynamics modelling approaches for multicohort management of eastern Canadian boreal forests , 2004 .

[32]  L. Lundqvist,et al.  Influence of local stand basal area on density and growth of regeneration in uneven‐aged Picea abies stands , 1996 .

[33]  K. Gadow,et al.  Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests? , 2006 .

[34]  J. Kush,et al.  Basal Area Growth of Individual Trees: A Model Derived from a Regional Longleaf Pine Growth Study , 1994 .