Bowel cleansing effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG + Asc in the real-world setting: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study of over 13000 patients

Abstract Background and study aims Effective bowel cleansing is critical for detecting lesions during colonoscopy, highlighting the importance of bowel preparations. 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG) + ascorbate (Asc) is the only recommended 1L PEG product in Europe and the United States. Its efficacy was demonstrated in large-scale controlled trials and confirmed in smaller-scale real-world studies. However, no large-scale real-world data exist. Patients and methods This observational, retrospective, multicenter study, used outpatient follow-up data from medical records from 10 centers in Spain and two in Portugal. Outpatients aged ≥18 years using 1L PEG + Asc as bowel preparation were included. The main outcome measures were overall adequate colon cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥6 with BBPS score ≥2 in each segment) and high-quality cleansing of the right colon (BBPS score=3). Results Data from 13169 eligible patients were included. Overall cleansing success was achieved in 89.3% (95%CI 88.7%-89.8%) and high-quality cleansing in the right colon in 49.3% (95%CI 48.4%–50.2%) of patients. For the overnight split-dose and same-day regimens, overall adequate quality cleansing success rate was 94.7% and 86.7% ( P <0.0001) and high-quality cleansing of the right colon rate was 65.4% and 41.4% ( P <0.0001), respectively. Colonoscopy was completed in 97.3% of patients, with non-completion due to poor preparation in only 0.8%; 2.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). Conclusions This large-scale, real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness of 1L PEG + Asc in the total and right colon, with a low percentage of patients with AEs in routine clinical practice.

[1]  Xiaoli Zheng,et al.  Same-day single-dose vs large-volume split-dose regimens of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, World journal of clinical cases.

[2]  P. Lindfors,et al.  The Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Very Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Compared to Low and High-Volume Polyethylene Glycol-Solutions in the Real-Life Setting , 2022, Diagnostics.

[3]  A. Repici,et al.  Safety of a novel 1L-polyethylene glycol-ascorbate solution for colonoscopy cleansing (REAL Study). , 2022, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[4]  A. Curatolo,et al.  SAFETY OF A NOVEL 1L-POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL-ASCORBATE SOLUTION FOR COLONOSCOPY CLEANSING (REAL STUDY) , 2022, ESGE Days 2022.

[5]  F. Dias de Castro,et al.  Bowel cleansing efficacy for colonoscopy: prospective, randomized comparative study of same-day dosing with 1-L and 2-L PEG + ascorbate , 2021, Endoscopy international open.

[6]  C. Hassan,et al.  Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group , 2021, Endoscopy International Open.

[7]  B. Cash,et al.  Patient experience with NER1006 as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter US survey , 2021, BMC Gastroenterology.

[8]  C. Hassan,et al.  Improved detection of colorectal adenomas by high-quality colon cleansing , 2020, Endoscopy International Open.

[9]  E. Sinagra,et al.  Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study , 2020, World journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  A. J. Bullard,et al.  Baseline Colonoscopy Findings Associated with 10-Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort Undergoing Colonoscopy Surveillance. , 2020, Gastroenterology.

[11]  C. Hassan,et al.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019 , 2019, Endoscopy.

[12]  F. Radaelli The paradox of the novel 1 L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: efficacy, not tolerability, is the great new! , 2018, Endoscopy.

[13]  R. Bisschops,et al.  Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial , 2018, Endoscopy.

[14]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial , 2018, Endoscopy.

[15]  W. Fischbach,et al.  Characteristics of right-sided colonic neoplasia and colonoscopy barriers limiting their early detection and prognosis: a review of the literature , 2018, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[16]  Christopher V. Almario,et al.  Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial , 2017, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[17]  A. Barkun,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon cleansing preparations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease , 2017, World journal of gastroenterology.

[18]  C. Daskalakis,et al.  Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis , 2017, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[19]  M. Epstein,et al.  Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[20]  Wei-Chih Liao,et al.  Same-day Versus Split-dose Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[21]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative , 2017, United European gastroenterology journal.

[22]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative , 2016, Endoscopy.

[23]  L. Laine,et al.  High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps. , 2016, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[24]  S. Flanagan,et al.  Pharmacodynamic and Clinical Evaluation of Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Based Bowel Cleansing Solutions (NER1006) Using Split Dosing in Healthy and Screening Colonoscopy Subjects: 655 , 2014 .

[25]  A. Barkun,et al.  Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[26]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Optimizing Adequacy of Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2014, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[27]  Weilin Wang,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Solution as Bowel Preparations for Colonoscopy , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  B. Zikmund‐Fisher,et al.  Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy. , 2014, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[29]  D. Early,et al.  Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[30]  Alfred I. Neugut,et al.  The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[31]  Marcin Polkowski,et al.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  K. H. Park,et al.  Patient Factors Predictive of Inadequate Bowel Preparation Using Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Study in Korea , 2009, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[33]  F. Radaelli,et al.  Technical Performance of Colonoscopy: The Key Role of Sedation/Analgesia and Other Quality Indicators , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[34]  Bernard Burnand,et al.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[35]  V. Sharma,et al.  Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[36]  M. Byrne The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[37]  I. Forgacs GASTROENTEROLOGY , 1988, The Lancet.