X-Ray Energy Self-Adaption High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Based on Linear Constraints With Variable Energy

In X-ray imaging, the image quality is related to the ray energy, imaging detector, object construction, etc. For complex workpieces, if all imaging conditions are identical, not all of the construction projection information can be captured with a fixed energy and limited dynamic range. This will result in over- and underexposed regions, which will affect projection quality. Thus, this paper presents an approach to extend the dynamic range of X-ray imaging systems based on linear constraints with variable energy. First, we study the relationship of grey variation between the adjacent energy images and present the grey gain distribution and linear dispersion. Then, based on a piecewise curve linear approximation, auto-self-adaption variation of ray energy is used to capture the image sequences under the linear constraint of the grey gain distribution. Also, based on the linear assumption, we obtain the weighting fusion coefficient to fuse the image sequences to extend the dynamic range. Finally, experiments demonstrate that this method has an advantage for ray energy auto-control and fusion coefficient calculation, which can realize optimal matching between the X-ray imaging system and the testing object to extend the dynamic range of the imaging system.

[1]  Arthur Burgess On the noise variance of a digital mammography system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  Xiangqian Jiang,et al.  Multisensor data fusion in dimensional metrology , 2009 .

[3]  Michael Knaup,et al.  New approaches to region of interest computed tomography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  William Ching,et al.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review , 2014, Journal of medical radiation sciences.

[5]  P F van der Stelt,et al.  The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  A Macovski,et al.  Energy dependent reconstruction in X-ray computerized tomography. , 1976, Computers in biology and medicine.

[7]  Mark A. Haidekker,et al.  Enhanced dynamic range x-ray imaging , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[8]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Industrial applications of computed tomography , 2014 .

[9]  J S Mattoon Digital radiography. , 2006, Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T.

[10]  Maximilian F Reiser,et al.  Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  K Thayalan Screen-Film Radiography , 2014 .

[12]  Chen Ping,et al.  A soft-threshold filtering EM-TV algorithm for CT reconstruction , 2015 .

[13]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Model-based image reconstruction for dual-energy X-ray CT with fast KVP switching , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[14]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Predrag Sukovic,et al.  A method for extending the dynamic range of flat panel imagers for use in cone beam computed tomography , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[16]  M Desco,et al.  Dual-exposure technique for extending the dynamic range of x-ray flat panel detectors. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  A. Weckenmann,et al.  Multi-energy image stack fusion in computed tomography , 2010 .

[18]  Gabor T Herman,et al.  Data fusion in X-ray computed tomography using a superiorization approach. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[19]  Jinxiao Pan,et al.  High-Dynamic-Range CT Reconstruction Based on Varying Tube-Voltage Imaging , 2015, PloS one.