Infection capacities in the orange-pathogen relationship: compatible (Penicillium digitatum) and incompatible (Penicillium expansum) interactions.

Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium expansum are the most devastating pathogens of citrus and pome fruits, respectively. Whereas P. digitatum is a very specific pathogen that only infects Citrus fruits, P. expansum has a broader host range but has not been reported to be infectious in Citrus. To determine the responses of fruits and the infection capacities of both moulds, two varieties of oranges at different maturity stages, different inoculum concentrations and two different storage temperatures were studied. In compatible interactions, no significant differences in rot dynamics among harvests were found with a 10(7) conidia mL(-1) inoculum concentration at both temperatures tested (20 °C and 4 °C). However, at other inoculum concentrations, significant differences in rot dynamics were found, especially in immature fruits. Incompatible interactions showed that P. expansum could infect oranges at commercial maturity in both tested varieties. Decay incidence and severity were higher at 4 °C than at 20 °C. In addition to infection capacity studies, histochemical tests were performed to detect wound-healing compounds for both pathogens. A positive reaction for lignin was detected for both pathogens in immature oranges over a short period (48 h). In all cases, no reactions were found in control samples. Our results indicate that pathogen concentration, host maturity and storage temperature can play important roles in the defence mechanisms of fruit. Furthermore, to our knowledge, this is the first work that demonstrates that P. expansum can infect oranges under favourable conditions.

[1]  Nawal Kishore Dubey,et al.  Exploitation of natural products as an alternative strategy to control postharvest fungal rotting of fruit and vegetables , 2004 .

[2]  M. Davey,et al.  Relationship of apple vitamin C and antioxidant contents to harvest date and postharvest pathogen infection , 2007 .

[3]  V. Higgins,et al.  The effect of hydrogen peroxide on the viability of tomato cells and of the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum , 1999 .

[4]  Hur-Song Chang,et al.  Quantitative Nature of Arabidopsis Responses during Compatible and Incompatible Interactions with the Bacterial Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Online version contains Web-only data. Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.007591. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[5]  J. Usall,et al.  Possible involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the development of resistance mechanisms in ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit , 2003 .

[6]  R. Evert,et al.  Wound healing in whole potato tubers: a cytochemical, fluorescence, and ultrastructural analysis of cut and bruise wounds , 1995 .

[7]  R. Hückelhoven.  Cell wall-associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. , 2007, Annual review of phytopathology.

[8]  M. Torres.  ROS in biotic interactions. , 2010, Physiologia plantarum.

[9]  O. Yarden,et al.  Differential protein expression in Colletotrichum acutatum: changes associated with reactive oxygen species and nitrogen starvation implicated in pathogenicity on strawberry. , 2008, Molecular plant pathology.

[10]  A. Mayer,et al.  Mechanisms of survival of necrotrophic fungal plant pathogens in hosts expressing the hypersensitive response. , 2001, Phytochemistry.

[11]  Li Bo,et al.  Modeling the effect of temperature on the growth rate and lag phase of Penicillium expansum in apples. , 2007, International journal of food microbiology.

[12]  Paul M. Chen,et al.  Effect of harvest maturity on decay and post-harvest life of ‘d'Anjou’ pear , 1987 .

[13]  J. Usall,et al.  Anti-oxidant activity of oranges after infection with the pathogen Penicillium digitatum or treatment with the biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2 , 2011 .

[14]  S. Marín,et al.  Inoculum size and intraspecific interactions affects Penicillium expansum growth and patulin accumulation in apples. , 2008, Food microbiology.

[15]  K. Koutsoumanis,et al.  Modelling growth of Penicillium expansum and Aspergillus niger at constant and fluctuating temperature conditions. , 2010, International journal of food microbiology.

[16]  V. Sanchis,et al.  Imazalil resistantPenicillium isolates from Spanish apple packinghouses , 1993, Mycopathologia.

[17]  J. Glazebrook.  Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. , 2005, Annual review of phytopathology.

[18]  D. Sugar,et al.  Wounding, wound healing and staining of mature pear fruit , 1998 .

[19]  J. Usall,et al.  Effect of water activity and temperature on germination and growth of Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum and Geotrichum candidum. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[20]  M. Mulas,et al.  Lignin and gum deposition in wounded ‘Oroval’ clementines as affected by chilling and peel water content , 1996 .

[21]  R. Dixon,et al.  THE OXIDATIVE BURST IN PLANT DISEASE RESISTANCE. , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[22]  Li Bo,et al.  The effect of inoculum size on the growth of Penicillium expansum in apples. , 2008, Food microbiology.

[23]  K. V. Krishnamurthy.  Methods in Cell Wall Cytochemistry , 1999 .

[24]  V. Higgins,et al.  Hydrogen peroxide plays a critical role in the defence response of tomato to Cladosporium fulvum , 2002 .

[25]  A. Levine,et al.  The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea , 2000, Current Biology.

[26]  Lise Korsten,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. , 2002, Annual review of phytopathology.

[27]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Biological control of post-harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: alternatives to synthetic fungicides , 1991 .

[28]  Alex Levine,et al.  H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response , 1994, Cell.

[29]  Luis González-Candelas,et al.  Biochemical and molecular characterization of induced resistance against Penicillium digitatum in citrus fruit , 2010 .

[30]  N. Huo,et al.  Comparative analysis of early H2O2 accumulation in compatible and incompatible wheat–powdery mildew interactions , 2005 .

[31]  G. E. Brown.  Resistance of Healed Citrus Exocarp to Penetration byPenicillium digitatum , 1983 .

[32]  S. Midland,et al.  An antifungal compound produced by grapefruit and Valencia orange after wounding of the peel. , 1993, Journal of natural products.

[33]  K. Zeng,et al.  Enhancing disease resistance in harvested mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. 'Matisu') fruit by salicylic acid , 2006 .

[34]  R. Castoria,et al.  Resistance of postharvest biocontrol yeasts to oxidative stress: a possible new mechanism of action. , 2003, Phytopathology.

[35]  J. Eckert,et al.  Development of resistance against Geotrichum candidum in lemon peel injuries , 1985 .

[36]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Penicillium digitatum Suppresses Production of Hydrogen Peroxide in Host Tissue During Infection of Citrus Fruit. , 2007, Phytopathology.

[37]  A. Lai,et al.  Characterization of the wound-induced material in Citrus paradisi fruit peel by carbon-13 CP-MAS solid state NMR spectroscopy. , 2003, Phytochemistry.

[38]  G. E. Brown.  Factors Affecting Postharvest Development of Collectotrichum gloeosporioides in Citrus Fruits , 1975 .