Detection of crustal deformation from the Landers earthquake sequence using continuous geodetic measurements

THE measurement of crustal motions in technically active regions is being performed increasingly by the satellite-based Global Positioning System (GPS)1,2, which offers considerable advantages over conventional geodetic techniques3,4. Continuously operating GPS arrays with ground-based receivers spaced tens of kilometres apart have been established in central Japan5,6 and southern California to monitor the spatial and temporal details of crustal deformation. Here we report the first measurements for a major earthquake by a continuously operating GPS network, the Permanent GPS Geodetic Array (PGGA)7–9 in southern California. The Landers (magnitude Afw of 7.3) and Big Bear (M w 6.2) earthquakes of 28 June 1992 were monitored by daily observations. Ten weeks of measurements, centred on the earthquake events, indicate significant coseismic motion at all PGGA sites, significant post-seismic motion at one site for two weeks after the earthquakes, and no significant preseismic motion. These measurements demonstrate the potential of GPS monitoring for precise detection of precursory and aftershock seismic deformation in the near and far field.

[1]  Y. Bock,et al.  Global Positioning System Network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California , 1989 .

[2]  Sean C. Solomon,et al.  Geodetic measurement of deformation in the central Mojave Desert, California , 1986 .

[3]  K. Rybicki The elastic residual field of a very long strike-slip fault in the presence of a discontinuity , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Y. Okada Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[5]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Crustal deformation measurements in central Japan determined by a Global Positioning System Fixed-Point Network , 1992 .

[6]  D. E. Smylie,et al.  The displacement fields of inclined faults , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Robert W. King,et al.  Measurement of Crustal Deformation Using the Global Positioning System , 1991 .

[8]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Absolute far-field displacements from the 28 June 1992 Landers earthquake sequence , 1993, Nature.

[9]  James L. Davis,et al.  Geodesy by radio interferometry: The application of Kalman Filtering to the analysis of very long baseline interferometry data , 1990 .

[10]  BASELINES IN THE CALIFORNIA PERMANENT GPS GEODETIC ARRAY , 1991 .

[11]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Initial investigation of the Landers, California, Earthquake of 28 June 1992 using TERRAscope , 1992 .

[12]  E. Hartwig Institutions supported by ONR Ocean Sciences , 1992 .

[13]  Takao Eguchi,et al.  Detection of a volcanic fracture opening in Japan using Global Positioning System measurements , 1990, Nature.

[14]  C. Scholz The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[15]  G. Blewitt Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km , 1989 .

[16]  J. C. Savage,et al.  An apparent shear zone trending north-northwest across the Mojave Desert into Owens Valley, eastern , 1990 .

[17]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  An Automatic Editing Algorithm for GPS data , 1990 .

[18]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  An introduction to the global positioning system and some geological applications , 1991 .

[19]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW , 1990 .