Intrathecal Morphine and Oral Analgesics Provide Safe and Effective Pain Control After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. Retrospective comparative study. Objective. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that intrathecal morphine (ITM) and oral analgesics provide effective pain control after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and this protocol has a low complication rate so patients can be admitted to a general care floor. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have shown that ITM combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia or epidural infusion (EPI) provides effective pain control after PSF for AIS. Owing to concerns for respiratory depression, ITM patients were routinely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively. There are little data on ITM combined with oral analgesics. Methods. We identified AIS patients aged 10 to 17 years who had undergone PSF. Twenty-eight patients who received ITM were matched to 28 patients who received a hydromorphone EPI. The ITM group received oral oxycodone starting at 16 hours postinjection. The EPI group received oxycodone after the epidural catheter was removed on postoperative day 2. Pain scores, adverse events, and length of stay were recorded. Results. A higher number of EPI patients received fentanyl (11 vs. 3, P = 0.014) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The ITM group had lower pain scores between PACU discharge and midnight (mean 2.9 vs. 4.2, P = 0.034). Pain scores were similar during the remaining postoperative periods. All ITM patients transitioned to oxycodone without intravenous opioids. Time to ambulation (19.9 vs. 26.5 hours, P = 0.010) and Foley catheter removal (21.3 vs. 41.9 hours, P < 0.001) were earlier in the ITM patients. Length of hospital stay was shorter in the ITM group (3.1 vs. 3.5 days, P = 0.043). Adverse events occurred at similar rates in both groups. Conclusion. ITM and oral analgesics provide safe and effective pain control after PSF for AIS. Routine postoperative admission to the ICU is not necessary. Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  A retrospective comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural hydromorphone for analgesia following posterior spinal fusion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis , 2017, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[2]  M. Caird,et al.  Narcotic-only Epidural Infusion for Posterior Spinal Fusion Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Review , 2016, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[3]  Peter N. Johnson,et al.  Duration of intrathecal morphine effect in children with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. , 2015, Journal of opioid management.

[4]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Pain Management in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion: Combined Intrathecal Morphine and Continuous Epidural Versus PCA , 2012, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  J. Son-Hing,et al.  Continuous Intravenous Morphine Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2010, Spine.

[6]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Epidural Analgesia Compared With Intravenous Analgesia After Pediatric Posterior Spinal Fusion , 2009, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  T. Milbrandt,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods of Pain Control for Posterior Spinal Fusions in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2009, Spine.

[8]  J. Son-Hing,et al.  Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion , 2008, Spine.

[9]  D. Ceroni,et al.  Safety and efficacy of patient controlled epidural analgesia following pediatric spinal surgery , 2007, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[10]  D. Sucato,et al.  Postoperative Analgesia Following Surgical Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Continuous Epidural Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Analgesia , 2005, Spine.

[11]  K. Tremper,et al.  Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  I. Murat,et al.  Analgesic Effect of Low-dose Intrathecal Morphine after Spinal Fusion in Children , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Michael J. Curtin,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Intravenous Opioids Versus Epidural Analgesia on Recovery After Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2000, Spine.

[14]  G. Lederhaas,et al.  A Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Intravenous Patient‐Controlled Analgesia After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents , 2000, Regional anesthesia and pain medicine.

[15]  B. Shaw,et al.  The safety of continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in pediatric spine surgery. , 1996, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  B. Dahlström.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Epidural and Intrathecal Morphine , 1986, International anesthesiology clinics.