Disaster Evacuation from Japan's 2011 Tsunami Disaster and the Fukushima Nuclear Accident
暂无分享,去创建一个
JAPAN’S 2011 DISASTER: RESPONSES TO NATURAL AND INDUSTRIAL
CATASTROPHES
The triple disaster that hit the Tohoku region of Japan on 11 March 2011
triggered a massive human displacement: more than 400,000 people
evacuated their homes as a gigantic tsunami induced by a magnitude 9.0
earthquake engulfed the coastal areas, and the following nuclear accident
in Fukushima released a large amount of radioactive materials into the
atmosphere. This study analyses the disaster response, with a particular
focus on evacuation of the population, and social consequences of this
complex crisis, based on intensive fieldwork carried out one year after the
catastrophe. It reveals that the responses of the Japanese authorities and
population were significantly different between a natural disaster and an
industrial (man-made) accident.
TWO EVACUATION PATTERNS: RISK PERCEPTION VERSUS VULNERABILITY
Being prone to both earthquakes and tsunamis, Japan had been preparing
itself against such risks for many years. A tsunami alert was immediately
issued and the population knew how and where to evacuate. In contrast,
the evacuation from the nuclear accident was organised in total chaos, as
a severe accident or large-scale evacuation had never been envisaged—let
alone exercised—before the disaster. The population was thus forced to
flee with no information as to the gravity of the accident or radiation risk.
In both cases, the risk perception prior to the catastrophe played a key role
in determining the vulnerability of the population at the time of the crisis.
SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES FROM THE DISASTER: DIVIDED COMMUNITIES
AND FAMILIES
While tsunami evacuees are struggling with a slow reconstruction
process due to financial difficulties, nuclear evacuees are suffering from
uncertainty as to their prospect of return. One year after the accident,
the Japanese authorities began to encourage nuclear evacuees to return
to the areas contaminated by radiation according to a newly established
safety standard. This triggered a vivid controversy within the affected
communities, creating a rift between those who trust the government’s
notion of safety and those who do not. The nuclear disaster has thus
become a major social disaster in Japan dividing and weakening the
affected communities.
www.iddri
[1] F. Gemenne,et al. The state of environmental migration, 2011. , 2011 .
[2] François Gemenne. Migrations et déplacements de populations dans un monde à + 4° C , 2011 .
[3] Migration, a possible adaptation strategy? , 2010 .
[4] Kay Kitazawa,et al. Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response , 2012 .
[5] A. Magnan. For a better understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change: a research framework , 2010 .