Advantages of Glove Finger–coated Polyvinyl Acetate Pack in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Background This study investigated the efficacy of glove finger–coated polyvinyl acetate (PA) pack on hemostasis, pain levels, and wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled study was performed in 30 patients who underwent bilateral ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. Fifteen patients (control group) had both nasal cavities packed with PA pack (Merocel; Medtronic Xomed, Jacksonville, FL) and another 15 subjects (experimental group) had their nasal cavities packed with PA in a glove finger. Pain levels were assessed by patients on a visual analog scale 12 hours after surgery and at the time of packing removal. The amount of bleeding on removal were quantified by weighing it after removal. Lund-Kennedy score and synechiae formation were assessed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. The use of analgesics and oral steroid was compared between the two groups. Results The experimental group showed lower levels of pain and lessened bleeding during packing removal than the control group. There were no differences in pain levels at 12 hours after surgery, use of analgesics and oral steroid between the two groups. One (6%) of each group had postoperative bleeding and required additional packing for hemostasis. Lower Lund-Kennedy score at postoperative 4 weeks was documented in the experimental group. In addition, two (13%) control subjects developed a synechiae between the middle turbinate and the lateral wall. Conclusion PA packing in a glove finger is advantageous in terms of pain, bleeding on packing removal, and postoperative wound healing, compared with PA pack only.

[1]  H. Koçoğlu,et al.  The Effect of Prilocaine or Levobupivacaine Infiltration on Pain during Nasal Packing Removal , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  Y. Kim,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Controlled Trial on Biodegradable Synthetic Polyurethane foam as a Packing Material after Septoplasty , 2011, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[3]  T. Seyhan A comfortable and practical nasal packing method: tied Merocel in clear glove finger impregnated with lidocaine-prilocaine cream. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  P. Rapiejko,et al.  Use of CMC foam sinus dressing in FESS , 2010, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[5]  A. Leunig,et al.  Control of bleeding following functional endoscopic sinus surgery using carboxy-methylated cellulose packing , 2009, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[6]  Y. Yılmaz,et al.  The effects of merocel and glove finger tampon applications on the nasal septum mucosa of rabbits. , 2008, Rhinology.

[7]  S. Nordgård,et al.  Effects of Nonabsorbable Packing in Middle Meatus after Sinus Surgery , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  A. Cowin,et al.  The Effect of an Expandable Polyvinyl Acetate (Merocel) Pack on the Healing of the Nasal Mucosa of Sheep , 2005, American journal of rhinology.

[9]  R. Chandra,et al.  Long-Term Effects of FloSeal™ Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery , 2005, American journal of rhinology.

[10]  R. Chandra,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery , 2004, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[11]  R. Chandra,et al.  The Effect of FloSeal on Mucosal Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison with Thrombin-Soaked Gelatin Foam , 2003, American journal of rhinology.

[12]  A. Cowin,et al.  Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep. , 2000, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[13]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Staging for Rhinosinusitis , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  J. Mauriello,et al.  External dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flaps: comparison of petroleum jelly gauze nasal packing with gelatin sponge nasal packing. , 1996, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[15]  R. Corbridge,et al.  A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the use of merocel nasal tampons and BIPP in the control of acute epistaxis. , 1995, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[16]  A. Brightwell,et al.  A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery , 1994, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[17]  M. Hawke,et al.  A new type of nasal packing for use in endoscopic sinus surgery. , 1992, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  O. Hilberg,et al.  Nasal packing after septoplasty. , 1992, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[19]  J. Ruddy,et al.  A prospective trial of Merocel packs. , 1991, Rhinology.