Corticospinal excitability changes to anodal tDCS elucidated with NIRS-EEG joint-imaging: An ischemic stroke study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate corticospinal excitability. We used near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) - electroencephalography (EEG) joint-imaging during and after anodal tDCS to measure changes in mean cerebral haemoglobin oxygen saturation (rSO2) along with changes in the log-transformed mean-power of EEG within 0.5 Hz - 11.25 Hz. In two separate studies, we investigated local post-tDCS alterations from baseline at the site of anodal tDCS using NIRS-EEG/tDCS joint-imaging as well as local post-tDCS alterations in motor evoked potentials (MEP)-measure of corticospinal excitability. In the first study, we found that post-tDCS changes in the mean rSO2 from baseline mostly correlated with the corresponding post-tDCS change in log-transformed mean-power of EEG within 0.5 Hz - 11.25 Hz. Moreover, a decrease in log-transformed mean-power of EEG within 0.5 Hz - 11.25 Hz corresponded with an increase in the MEP-measure of corticospinal excitability - found in the second study. Therefore, we propose to combine NIRS-EEG/tDCS joint-imaging with corticospinal excitability investigation in a single study to confirm these finding. Furthermore, we postulate that the innovative technologies for portable NIRS-EEG neuroimaging may be leveraged to objectively quantify the progress (e.g., corticospinal excitability alterations) and dose tDCS intervention as an adjuvant treatment during neurorehabilitation.

[1]  H. Siesler,et al.  Near-infrared spectroscopy:principles,instruments,applications , 2002 .

[2]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  Near infra-red spectroscopy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in FPGA-based hardware for point of care testing of cerebral vascular status - A stroke study , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[3]  Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury,et al.  Development of Point of Care Testing Device for Neurovascular Coupling From Simultaneous Recording of EEG and NIRS During Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2015, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[4]  Sebastian Haufe,et al.  The role of alpha-rhythm states in perceptual learning: insights from experiments and computational models , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[5]  P. Schestatsky,et al.  Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[6]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke , 2014, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  EEG-NIRS Based Assessment of Neurovascular Coupling During Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - a Stroke Case Series , 2015, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Michael A. Nitsche,et al.  Neural mass model analysis of online modulation of electroencephalogram with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[10]  D. Attwell,et al.  Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow , 2022 .

[11]  David A. Boas,et al.  Short separation channel location impacts the performance of short channel regression in NIRS , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[13]  Agnes Flöel,et al.  tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[18]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  C. Iadecola,et al.  Neurovascular coupling in the normal brain and in hypertension, stroke, and Alzheimer disease. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on cortico-muscular coherence and standing postural steadiness , 2011, EMBC 2011.

[22]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.