Playing TETRIS for science counter-regulatory affective processing in a motivationally "hot" context.

We adapted the computer game TETRIS to investigate the process of affective-motivational counter-regulation, that is, attentional biases for emotional stimuli that are in opposition to the momentary motivational focus. Counter-regulation is seen as a mechanism which should prevent escalation and impulsivity, and it should help to avoid becoming "locked up" in affective-motivational states. Accordingly, for a negative outcome focus condition (i.e., risk of losing a current high score), we hypothesized greater interference by positive distractors that were included in the game, whereas for a positive outcome focus (i.e., chance to improve one's current high score), we hypothesized greater interference by negative distractors. Supporting our hypotheses, we found the predicted interactions between distractor valence and type of outcome focus.

[1]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  T. Brosch,et al.  The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: a comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. , 2005, Emotion.

[3]  J. Förster,et al.  Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention , 2006 .

[4]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[5]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Murray White,et al.  Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion , 1995 .

[8]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[9]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Simons,et al.  The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[11]  J. Mordkoff.  18. Selective attention and internal constraints: there is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies , 1996 .

[12]  D. Derryberry.  Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects , 1993 .

[13]  K. Rothermund.  Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. , 2003, Emotion.

[14]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic attention to stimuli signalling chances and dangers: Moderating effects of positive and negative goal and action contexts , 2001 .

[16]  S. Koole.  The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review , 2009 .

[17]  S C Draine,et al.  Replicable unconscious semantic priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: a basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in emotion and motivation. , 2008, Emotion.

[19]  A. Schwartzman,et al.  Stress and selective attention: the interplay of mood, cortisol levels, and emotional information processing. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[20]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[21]  P. Maglio,et al.  Evidence for the role of self-priming in epistemic action: expertise and the effective use of memory. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[23]  F. Strack,et al.  Approach/Avoidance–Related Motor Actions and the Processing of Affective Stimuli: Incongruency Effects in Automatic Attention Allocation , 2005 .

[24]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .