Implementing a Layered Analytic Approach For Real-Time Modeling of Students' Scientific Understanding

We have developed layered analytic models of how high school and university students construct, modify and retain problem solving strategies as they learn to solve science problems online. First, item response theory modeling is used to provide continually refined estimates of problem solving ability as students solve a series of simulations. In parallel, the strategies students apply are modeled by self-organizing artificial neural network analysis, using the actions that students take during problem solving as the classifying inputs. This results in strategy maps detailing the qualitative and quantitative differences among problem solving approaches. Learning trajectories across sequences of student performances are developed by applying Hidden Markov Modeling to stochastically model problem solving progress through the strategic stages in the learning process. Using this layered analytical approach we have found that students quickly adopt preferential problem solving strategies, and continue to use them up to four months later. Furthermore, the approach has shown that students working in groups solve a higher percentage of the problems, stabilize their strategic approaches quicker, and use a more limited repertoire of strategies than students working alone. In this paper, we also describe our ongoing and future work in developing an online collaborative learning environment that both models the group interaction and identifies which individual student contributions might contribute to increased achievement.

[1]  Amy Soller,et al.  Strategic Collaboration Support in a Web-based Scientific Inquiry Environment , 2004 .

[2]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[3]  Amy Soller,et al.  Probabilities and predictions: modeling the development of scientific problem-solving skills. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[4]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[5]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Science Teaching and Development Of Thinking , 1994 .

[6]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[7]  Susanne P. Lajoie Transitions and Trajectories for Studies of Expertise , 2003 .

[8]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Artificial neural networks can distinguish novice and expert strategies during complex problem solving. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[9]  R. Mayer Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving , 1998 .

[10]  Amy Soller,et al.  Understanding knowledge-sharing breakdowns: a meeting of the quantitative and qualitative minds , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[12]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences in Young Children’s Mathematical Thinking , 1998 .

[13]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  R. Stevens,et al.  Artificial neural network-based performance assessments , 1999 .

[15]  R H Stevens,et al.  Artificial neural networks as adjuncts for assessing medical students' problem solving performances on computer-based simulations. , 1993, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[16]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.