Natural and Anthropogenic Geohazards in Greater London Observed from Geological and ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT Persistent Scatterers Ground Motion Data: Results from the EC FP7-SPACE PanGeo Project

We combine geological data and ground motion estimates from satellite ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI) to delineate areas of observed natural and anthropogenic geohazards in the administrative area of Greater London (United Kingdom). This analysis was performed within the framework of the EC FP7-SPACE PanGeo project, and by conforming to the interpretation and geohazard mapping methodology extensively described in the Production Manual (cf. http://www.pangeoproject.eu). We discuss the results of the generation of the PanGeo digital geohazard mapping product for Greater London, and analyse the potential of PSI, geological data and the PanGeo methodology to identify areas of observed geohazards. Based on the analysis of PSI ground motion data sets for the years 1992–2000 and 2002–2010 and geology field campaigns, we identify 25 geohazard polygons, covering a total of ~650 km2. These include not only natural processes such as compaction of deposits on the River Thames flood plain and slope instability, but also anthropogenic instability due to groundwater management and changes in the Chalk aquifer, recent engineering works such as those for the Jubilee Line Extension project and electricity tunnelling in proximity to the River Thames, and the presence of made ground. In many instances, natural and anthropogenic observed geohazards overlap, therefore indicating interaction of different processes over the same areas. In terms of ground area covered, the dominant geohazard is anthropogenic land subsidence caused by groundwater abstraction for a total of ~300 km2, followed by natural compression of River Thames sediments over ~105 km2. Observed ground motions along the satellite line-of-sight are as high as +29.5 and −25.3 mm/year, and indicate a combination of land surface processes comprising ground subsidence and uplift, as well as downslope movements. Across the areas of observed geohazards, urban land cover types from the Copernicus (formerly GMES) EEA European Urban Atlas, e.g., continuous and discontinuous urban fabric and industrial units, show the highest average velocities away from the satellite sensor, and the smallest standard deviations (~0.7–1.0 mm/year). More rural land cover types such as agricultural, semi-natural and green areas reveal the highest spatial variability (up to ~4.4 mm/year), thus suggesting greater heterogeneity of observed motion rates within these land cover types. Areas of observed motion in the PSI data for which a geological interpretation cannot be found with sufficient degree of certainty are also identified, and their possible causes discussed. Although present in Greater London, some geohazard types such as shrink–swell clays and ground dissolution are not highlighted by the interpretation of PSI annual motion rates. Reasons for absence of evidence of the latter in the PSI data are discussed, together with difficulties related to the identification of good radar scatterers in landsliding areas.

[1]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  Nonuniform Ground Motion Monitoring With TerraSAR-X Persistent Scatterer Interferometry , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Luke Bateson,et al.  Measurement of ground movements in Stoke-on-Trent (UK) using radar interferometry , 2006 .

[3]  Janusz Wasowski,et al.  Investigating landslides with space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew Sowter,et al.  Land motion in the urban area of Nottingham observed by ENVISAT-1 , 2013 .

[5]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Permanent scatterer InSAR reveals seasonal and long‐term aquifer‐system response to groundwater pumping and artificial recharge , 2008 .

[6]  Norman Teferle,et al.  Geological interpretation of current subsidence and uplift in the London area, UK, as shown by high precision satellite-based surveying , 2014 .

[7]  C. Francesca,et al.  Nationwide monitoring of geohazards in Great Britain with InSAR: Feasibility mapping based on ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT imagery , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[8]  H. Zebker,et al.  Sensing the ups and downs of Las Vegas: InSAR reveals structural control of land subsidence and aquifer-system deformation , 1999 .

[9]  E. Haslam,et al.  A new apparatus for determining the shrinkage limit of clay soils , 2014 .

[10]  Batuhan Osmanoglu,et al.  Monitoring land subsidence and its induced geological hazard with Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry: A case study in Morelia, Mexico , 2012 .

[11]  M. Tesauro,et al.  Subsidence effects inside the city of Napoli (Italy) revealed by differential SAR interferometry , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[12]  Martin G. Culshaw,et al.  Landslide management in the UK—the problem of managing hazards in a ‘low-risk’ environment , 2013, Landslides.

[13]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  How to assess landslide activity and intensity with Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI): the PSI-based matrix approach , 2013, Landslides.

[14]  C. Foster,et al.  Mapping a Nation’s Landslides: A Novel Multi-Stage Methodology , 2013 .

[15]  F. Cigna,et al.  Monitoring post-closure large scale surface deformation in mining areas , 2013 .

[16]  Alan Smith Digital Geological Map of Great Britain, information notes, 2013 , 2011 .

[17]  L. Bateson,et al.  Terrafirma : London H-3 Modelled Product : comparison of PS data with the results of a groundwater abstraction related subsidence model , 2009 .

[18]  M. Crosetto,et al.  Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: Potential, Limits and Initial C- and X-band Comparison , 2010 .

[19]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Automated classification of Persistent Scatterers Interferometry time series , 2013 .

[20]  J. Walsby GeoSure; a bridge between geology and decision-makers , 2008 .

[21]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  Assessing short‐ and long‐time displacements in the Venice coastland by synthetic aperture radar interferometric point target analysis , 2007 .

[22]  C. Werner,et al.  Interferometric point target analysis for deformation mapping , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[23]  Luke Bateson,et al.  DInSAR estimation of land motion using intermittent coherence with application to the South Derbyshire and Leicestershire coalfields , 2013 .

[24]  M. Pitt Learning lessons from the 2007 floods , 2008 .

[25]  Martin G. Culshaw,et al.  The relationship between shrink–swell occurrence and climate in south-east England , 2012 .

[26]  K. A. Lee,et al.  User Guide for the British Geological Survey GeoSure dataset. Version 8 , 2010 .

[27]  K. Lawrie,et al.  The national landslide database of Great Britain: development, evolution and applications , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[28]  Luke Bateson,et al.  PANGEO : enabling access to geological information in support of GMES : deliverable 3.5 production manual. Version 1 , 2012 .

[29]  M. Manunta,et al.  DInSAR measurements of ground deformation by sinkholes, mining subsidence, and landslides, Ebro River, Spain , 2009 .

[30]  J. Bonachea,et al.  Integrating geomorphological mapping, trenching, InSAR and GPR for the identification and characterization of sinkholes: A review and application in the mantled evaporite karst of the Ebro Valley (NE Spain) , 2011 .

[31]  Deodato Tapete,et al.  Instability mechanisms affecting cultural heritage sites in the Maltese Archipelago , 2012 .

[32]  John Burland,et al.  Unexpected tunnelling volume losses in the Westminster area, London , 2006 .

[33]  John Burland,et al.  Geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation , 2012 .

[34]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Semi-automated extraction of Deviation Indexes (DI) from satellite Persistent Scatterers time series: tests on sedimentary volcanism and tectonically-induced motions , 2012 .

[35]  Luke Bateson,et al.  The application of the Intermittent SBAS (ISBAS) InSAR method to the South Wales Coalfield, UK , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[36]  D. P. Page Jubilee Line Extension , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[37]  Colm Jordan,et al.  Simulating SAR geometric distortions and predicting Persistent Scatterer densities for ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT C-band SAR and InSAR applications: Nationwide feasibility assessment to monitor the landmass of Great Britain with SAR imagery , 2014 .

[38]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Testing Computational Methods to Identify Deformation Trends in RADARSAT Persistent Scatterers Time Series for Structural Assessment of Archaeological Heritage , 2013, ICCSA.

[39]  A. Cooper,et al.  Karst geohazards in the UK: the use of digital data for hazard management , 2008, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[40]  Woods,et al.  Geology of London : special memoir for 1:50000 geological sheets 256 (north London), 257 (Romford), 270 (south London), and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) , 2004 .

[41]  Tazio Strozzi,et al.  SAR INTERFEROMETRIC POINT TARGET ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS FOR LANDSLIDES INVESTIGATIONS IN TICINO, SOUTHERN SWITZERLAND , 2007 .

[42]  S. Price,et al.  The use of karst geomorphology for planning, hazard avoidance and development in Great Britain , 2011 .

[43]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Detection of aquifer system compaction and land subsidence using interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert, California , 1998 .

[44]  L. Jones,et al.  Modelling Volume Change Potential in the London Clay , 2011 .

[45]  Gerardo Herrera,et al.  Advanced interpretation of subsidence in Murcia (SE Spain) using A-DInSAR data - modelling and validation , 2009 .

[46]  Damien Closson,et al.  Subsidence and Sinkhole Hazard Assessment in the Southern Dead Sea Area, Jordan , 2005 .